James Dorsey v. Officer Thomas, et al
| JAMES LEE DORSEY |
| MONICA WILIAMS, COLLEEN FRANKLIN, WALTER NICHOLSON, Warden and OFFICER THOMAS |
| 21-1858 |
| May 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Appellant James Lee Dorsey is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant James Lee Dorsey by 07/14/2021. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0002 1929 9132. [4] [7170186] [21-1858] (AD) [Entered: 06/30/2021 10:57 AM]
|
| Filing 3 FILED NOTICE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT THAT THE $505.00 APPELLATE FEE WAS RECEIVED. [3][7168381] [21-1858] (CM) [Entered: 06/23/2021 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7160509] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [21-1858] (FP) [Entered: 05/14/2021 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 05/27/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant James Lee Dorsey by 05/20/2021. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 06/14/2021. [1] [7160500] [21-1858] (FP) [Entered: 05/14/2021 03:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
