Peter Gakuba v. David Rains, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: PETER GAKUBA
Defendant / Appellee: MICHELLE NEESE, ROGER MOSS and DAVID RAINS, Warden
Case Number: 21-1864
Filed: May 14, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 1, 2022 Peter Gakuba v. David Rains

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2021 Filing 6 Filed District Court order dated 06/08/2021, regarding [104] Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Leave to Appeal IFP. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to forward this motion to the Seventh Circuit for consideration. Forwarded to CMD. [6] [7165748] [21-1864] (JR) [Entered: 06/09/2021 08:59 AM]
June 7, 2021 Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 20-3117, 21-1961 [5] [7165326] [21-1864] (CAH) [Entered: 06/07/2021 02:29 PM]
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file IFP on appeal motion to the extent that the appellant shall either pay the $505.00 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the district court by July 16, 2021. [ # 3 ] CMD [4] [7165279] [21-1864] (ER) [Entered: 06/07/2021 12:13 PM]
June 7, 2021 Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba to extend time to file in forma pauperis forms. [3] [7165220] [21-1864] (CM) [Entered: 06/07/2021 10:03 AM]
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Mr. Peter Gakuba is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Peter Gakuba by 06/16/2021. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0002 1929 8913. [2] [7164293] [21-1864] (AD) [Entered: 06/02/2021 12:55 PM]
May 14, 2021 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 05/28/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Peter Gakuba by 05/21/2021. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/28/2021 for Appellant Peter Gakuba. [1] [7160709] [21-1864] (FP) [Entered: 05/17/2021 12:03 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Peter Gakuba v. David Rains, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PETER GAKUBA
Represented By: Peter Gakuba
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICHELLE NEESE
Represented By: Nadine J. Wichern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROGER MOSS
Represented By: Nadine J. Wichern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID RAINS, Warden
Represented By: Nadine J. Wichern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?