Daniel Hawk v. Oneida Family Court, et al
DANIEL D. HAWK |
ONEIDA COURT OF APPEALS and ONEIDA FAMILY COURT |
21-1973 |
May 24, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 07/20/2021 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7173943-2] [7173943] [21-1973] (AG) [Entered: 07/20/2021 12:03 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Daniel D. Hawk leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 06/03/2021. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/06/2021 for Appellant Daniel D. Hawk [7164746] [5] [7164746] [21-1973] (AP) [Entered: 06/03/2021 03:30 PM] |
Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Daniel D. Hawk. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7164385] [21-1973] (CM) [Entered: 06/02/2021 03:18 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Daniel D. Hawk. [3] [7164384] [21-1973] (CM) [Entered: 06/02/2021 03:17 PM] |
Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7162740] [21-1973] (PS) [Entered: 05/25/2021 12:30 PM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Daniel D. Hawk by 06/01/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 06/07/2021. Fee or IFP forms due on 06/07/2021 for Appellant Daniel D. Hawk. [1] [7162725] [21-1973] (PS) [Entered: 05/25/2021 12:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.