Logan Dyjak v. Dana Wilkerson, et al
Defendant / Appellee: DONALD HENKE, RACHEL LINK, DESTINY KHARSI, DANA WILKERSON and REBECCA MINNICK
Plaintiff / Appellant: LOGAN DYJAK
Case Number: 21-2012
Filed: May 28, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 29, 2022 Logan Dyjak v. Dana Wilkerson

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2021 Filing 27 Amended Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak. [27] [7170292] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/30/2021 02:39 PM]
June 30, 2021 Filing 26 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 21-2119, 21-2022, 21-2032 [26] [7170290] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/30/2021 02:38 PM]
June 30, 2021 Filing 25 Prose motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [25] [7170289] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/30/2021 02:37 PM]
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER re: 1. Motion for Extension of Time. 2. Motion for Exemption from E-Filing, Deadlines, Length, Citation and Type Requirements. [ # 18 ] [ # 19 ] A review of the courts docket indicates that these consolidated appeals are proceeding to a ruling on appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and to a ruling on appellants motion to appoint counsel. Because the appellant has no pending deadlines, the motion for extension of time is DENIED as unnecessary at this time. The appellant may renew his motion once a briefing schedule has been set. The motion for exemption form E-filing is DENIED as unnecessary.The appellant may not file electronically, but his filings may be handwritten. CMD [24] [7170098] [21-2012, 21-2119] (MM) [Entered: 06/30/2021 08:47 AM]
June 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER re: Motion to consolidate appeals, filed on 6/28/2021. A review of the docket indicates that on June 22, 2021, this court consolidated this appeal with appeal 21-2012. Accordingly, the appellants motion to consolidate will be filed without further court action. CMD [23] [7169951] [21-2119, 21-2012] (FP) [Entered: 06/29/2021 02:45 PM]
June 28, 2021 Filing 22 Prose motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak in 21-2032 to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [22] [7169667] [21-2032, 21-2012, 21-2119] (DRS) [Entered: 06/28/2021 04:00 PM]
June 28, 2021 Filing 21 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak in 21-2119, 21-2012 to consolidate cases. [21] [7169661] [21-2119, 21-2012] (MAN) [Entered: 06/28/2021 03:53 PM]
June 24, 2021 Filing 20 Filed Appellant Logan Dyjak Memorandum In Support of motion for appointment of counsel. [20] [7168905] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/24/2021 01:28 PM]
June 24, 2021 Filing 19 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak for exemption of e-filings. [19] [7168904] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/24/2021 01:26 PM]
June 24, 2021 Filing 18 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak for extension of time. [18] [7168903] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/24/2021 01:25 PM]
June 24, 2021 Filing 17 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak. [17] [7168902] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/24/2021 01:23 PM]
June 24, 2021 Filing 16 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 21-2119, 21-2022, 21-2032, 21-2119 [16] [7168901] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/24/2021 01:22 PM]
June 24, 2021 Filing 15 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Logan Dyjak. [15] [7168899] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/24/2021 01:20 PM]
June 24, 2021 Filing 14 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak for appointment of counsel. [14] [7168898] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/24/2021 01:20 PM]
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: On consideration of the Memorandum of Law filed by appellant on June 21, 2021, in Appeal No. 21-2012, and in light of the district courts order of June 2, 2021, denying appellants motion for reconsideration, this appeal shall proceed to a ruling on appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and to a ruling on appellants motion to appoint counsel. Further, these appeals are CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. Briefing, however, remains SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [13] [7168145] [21-2012, 21-2119] (AD) [Entered: 06/22/2021 11:23 AM]
June 21, 2021 Filing 12 Prose motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [12] [7167913] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/21/2021 03:01 PM]
June 21, 2021 Filing 11 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 21-2022, 21-2032, 21-2119 [11] [7167911] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/21/2021 02:59 PM]
June 21, 2021 Filing 10 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Logan Dyjak. [10] [7167910] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/21/2021 02:58 PM]
June 21, 2021 Filing 9 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak. [9] [7167909] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/21/2021 02:57 PM]
June 21, 2021 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak for appointment of counsel. [8] [7167906] [21-2012] (CM) [Entered: 06/21/2021 02:55 PM]
June 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Appellant Logan Dyjak is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. CD. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Logan Dyjak by 07/01/2021. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0002 1929 9958. [7] [7167559] [21-2012] (FP) [Entered: 06/17/2021 03:08 PM]
June 17, 2021 Filing 6 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Logan Dyjak leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 06/16/2021. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/19/2021 for Appellant Logan Dyjak [7167379] [6] [7167379] [21-2012] (AP) [Entered: 06/17/2021 09:17 AM]
June 15, 2021 Filing 5 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [5] [7167076] [21-2012] (AG) [Entered: 06/15/2021 03:03 PM]
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: A preliminary review of the short record indicates that the order appealed from may not be a final appealable judgment within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 1291. A notice of appeal filed before the district court issues its ruling on a timely Rule 59 motion is ineffective until the order disposing of the motion is entered on the district court's civil docket. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). In the present case, appellant Logan Dyjak filed a Motion for Reconsideration no later than May 26, 2021 (the postmark on the envelope containing the motion). See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c) (prison mailbox rule). This was within 28 days of entry of order (which issued on April 29,2021) that appellant Logan Dyjak appeals. This may be a timely Rule 59 motion. See Obriecht v. Raemisch, 517 F.3d 489, 493-94 (7th Cir. 2008); Borrero v. City of Chicago, 456 F.3d 698, 699 (7th Cir. 2006); Charles v. Daley, 799 F.2d 343, 347 (7th Cir. 1986); see also Shales v. General Chauffeurs, Sales Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 330, 557 F.3d 746, 748 (7th Cir. 2009). As such, this appeal may be premature, because it appears that the district court has not disposed of the motion and entered its order on the district court's civil docket. Accordingly, appellant Logan Dyjak shall file, on or before June 16, 2021, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be STAYED pending the entry of the order disposing of the motion. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. [4] DW [4] [7164349] [21-2012] (AD) [Entered: 06/02/2021 02:59 PM]
May 28, 2021 Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: Appellee: Kimberly Law; Patricia Orr; [3] [7164012] [21-2012] (FP) [Entered: 06/01/2021 01:31 PM]
May 28, 2021 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7164010] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [21-2012] (FP) [Entered: 06/01/2021 01:28 PM]
May 28, 2021 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 06/11/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Logan Dyjak by 06/04/2021. Fee or IFP forms due on 06/11/2021 for Appellant Logan Dyjak. [1] [7164005] [21-2012] (FP) [Entered: 06/01/2021 01:16 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Logan Dyjak v. Dana Wilkerson, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DONALD HENKE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RACHEL LINK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DESTINY KHARSI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DANA WILKERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: REBECCA MINNICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LOGAN DYJAK
Represented By: Logan Dyjak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?