Logan Dyjak v. Melanie Kluzek, et al
LANA MILLER, AMBER CARLSON, MELANIE KLUZEK and DANA WILKERSON |
LOGAN DYJAK |
21-2032 |
June 2, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Logan Dyjak leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 07/23/2021. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 08/23/2021 for Appellant Logan Dyjak. Plaintiff is directed to file a declaration in compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1746 or a notarized statement by 8/9/2021. Forwarded to DW. [7174750] [21] [7174750] [21-2032] (AP) [Entered: 07/23/2021 12:39 PM] |
![]() |
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 07/21/2021 Limited Remand Order sent to the District Court Clerk. [7174201-2] [7174201] [21-2032] (AD) [Entered: 07/21/2021 10:44 AM] |
![]() |
Filing 18 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [18] [7169692] [21-2032] (CG) [Entered: 06/28/2021 04:36 PM] |
Filing 17 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [17] [7169671] [21-2032] (DRS) [Entered: 06/28/2021 04:06 PM] |
Filing 16 Amended Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak. [16] [7169668] [21-2032] (DRS) [Entered: 06/28/2021 04:04 PM] |
Filing 15 Prose motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak in 21-2032 to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [15] [7169667] [21-2032, 21-2012, 21-2119] (DRS) [Entered: 06/28/2021 04:00 PM] |
Filing 14 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [14] [7169028] [21-2032] (CMD) [Entered: 06/24/2021 04:11 PM] |
Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to reassess motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [13] [7168881] [21-2032] (CAH) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:38 PM] |
Filing 12 Filed Appellant Logan Dyjak Memorandum in support of motion to appoint counsel. [12] [7168880] [21-2032] (CAH) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:37 PM] |
Filing 11 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak for appointment of counsel. [11] [7168879] [21-2032] (CAH) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:36 PM] |
Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to alter caption. [10] [7168878] [21-2032] (CAH) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:36 PM] |
Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak for exemption from filing requirements. [9] [7168877] [21-2032] (CAH) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:35 PM] |
Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak for extension of time. [8] [7168876] [21-2032] (CAH) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:34 PM] |
Filing 7 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak. [7] [7168874] [21-2032] (CAH) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:33 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Logan Dyjak. [6] [7168873] [21-2032] (CAH) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:33 PM] |
Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 21-2012, 21-2119, 21-2022 [5] [7168872] [21-2032] (CAH) [Entered: 06/24/2021 12:32 PM] |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7164658] [21-2032] (AD) [Entered: 06/03/2021 12:30 PM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 06/16/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Logan Dyjak by 06/04/2021. Fee or IFP forms due on 06/16/2021 for Appellant Logan Dyjak [1] [7164652] [21-2032] (AD) [Entered: 06/03/2021 12:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.