Nate Lindell v. Cathy Jess, et al
Defendant / Appellee: MARK KARTMAN, CATHY JESS, GARY BOUGHTON and JIM SCHWOCHERT
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATE A. LINDELL
Case Number: 21-2221
Filed: June 30, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 5, 2022 Nate Lindell v. Cathy Jess

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [21] [7213608] [21-2221] (MLM) [Entered: 01/27/2022 09:06 AM]
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 01/05/2022 Nonprecedential Disposition and Final Judgment with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7213615-2] [7213615] [21-2221] (MLM) [Entered: 01/27/2022 09:17 AM]
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: Final judgment filed per nonprecedential disposition. With costs: yes. [20] [7209108] [21-2221] (CG) [Entered: 01/05/2022 04:22 PM]
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Filed Nonprecedential Disposition PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Michael Y. Scudder, Circuit Judge and Amy J. St. Eve, Circuit Judge. [19] [7209092] [21-2221] (CG) [Entered: 01/05/2022 04:13 PM]
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 10 copies Appellant's reply brief filed by Appellant Nate A. Lindell. Disk not required. [18] [7199202] [21-2221] (LJ) [Entered: 11/15/2021 03:16 PM]
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER re: Motion to strike appellees' brief and extend time for filing reply brief. The motion to strike appellees brief is DENIED. Appellees brief complies with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellants request for an extension of time to file his reply brief is GRANTED. Briefing in this appeal will proceed as follows: Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due by 11/23/21. [ # 16 ] [ # 16 ] NER [17] [7198148] [21-2221] (ER) [Entered: 11/09/2021 02:24 PM]
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Nate A. Lindell to strike Appellees Gary Boughton, Cathy Jess, Mark Kartman and Jim Schwochert brief and to extend time to file appellant's reply brief (CH sent pro se instructions to prepare brief and rulebook). [16] [7197407] [21-2221] (CAH) [Entered: 11/05/2021 02:28 PM]
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Paper copies of appellee brief filed by Appellees Gary Boughton, Cathy Jess, Mark Kartman and Jim Schwochert. [15] [7195544] [21-2221] (CAG) [Entered: 10/29/2021 09:39 AM]
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Appellee's brief filed by Appellees Gary Boughton, Cathy Jess, Mark Kartman and Jim Schwochert. Paper copies due on 11/03/2021 Electronically Transmitted. [14] [7195110] [21-2221] (MLM) [Entered: 10/27/2021 04:48 PM]
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Submitted appellee brief by Jody J. Schmelzer for Appellees Gary Boughton, Cathy Jess, Mark Kartman and Jim Schwochert. [13] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7194942] [21-2221] (Schmelzer, Jody) [Entered: 10/27/2021 01:29 PM]
September 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 10 copies Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Nate A. Lindell. Disk not required. [12] [7185288] [21-2221] (LJ) [Entered: 09/13/2021 02:43 PM]
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 10 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 09/27/2021 for Nate A. Lindell. Appellees' brief due on or before 10/27/2021 for Gary Boughton, Cathy Jess, Mark Kartman and Jim Schwochert. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 11/17/2021 for Appellant Nate A. Lindell. The appellant may submit his opening brief with a white cover if he does not have access to blue paper. SCR [11] [7183487] [21-2221] (HTP) [Entered: 09/03/2021 11:31 AM]
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Nate A. Lindell to extend time to file appellant's brief. [10] [7183394] [21-2221] (MAN) [Entered: 09/03/2021 09:10 AM]
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re: Appellant's motion to appoint counsel for appeal. IT IS ORDERED that the motion for recruitment of counsel is DENIED. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647 (7th Cir. 2007) (en banc); Farmer v. Haas, 990 F.2d 319, 321 (7th Cir. 1993). The panel assigned to decide this case may recruit counsel if it finds that step appropriate after reviewing the briefs. Briefing in this appeal will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 09/07/2021 for Nate A. Lindell. Appellee's brief due on or before 10/07/2021 for Gary Boughton, Cathy Jess, Mark Kartman and Jim Schwochert. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 10/28/2021 for Appellant Nate A. Lindell SCR [9] [7177312] [21-2221] (AG) [Entered: 08/05/2021 08:58 AM]
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: This appeal shall proceed to a ruling on appellants motion to appoint counsel. The briefing shall include issues concerning both the merits judgment and the district courts denial of appellants Rule 59 motion. The briefing schedule, however, remains SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [7175222] [21-2221] (PS) [Entered: 07/26/2021 03:42 PM]
July 26, 2021 Filing 7 Filed Response by Appellees Cathy Jess, Gary Boughton, Jim Schwochert and Mark Kartman Attorney Jody J. Schmelzer to Jurisdictional Memorandum. [7][7175013] [21-2221] (Schmelzer, Jody) [Entered: 07/26/2021 11:08 AM]
July 20, 2021 Filing 6 Appearance form filed by Attorney Jody J. Schmelzer for Appellees Gary Boughton, Cathy Jess, Mark Kartman and Jim Schwochert. [6] [7174052] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-2221]--[Edited 07/21/2021 by FP to reflect that atty. Held is termed and atty. Schmelzer is added to the docket.] (Schmelzer, Jody) [Entered: 07/20/2021 03:13 PM]
July 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: On consideration of the Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by appellant on July 16, 2021, appellees shall file, on or before July 26, 2021, a response to appellants filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of July 7, 2021. DW [5] [7173470] [21-2221] (AD) [Entered: 07/16/2021 03:32 PM]
July 16, 2021 Filing 4 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Nate A. Lindell. [4] [7173370] [21-2221] (DRS) [Entered: 07/16/2021 12:18 PM]
July 13, 2021 Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Nate A. Lindell for appointment of counsel. [3] [7172544] [21-2221] (DRS) [Entered: 07/13/2021 12:42 PM]
July 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Nate A. Lindell shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be LIMITED to a review of the order entered on June 15, 2021, denying appellant's Rule 59(e) motion. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7171449] DW Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Nate A. Lindell by 07/21/2021. [2] [7171449] [21-2221] (FP) [Entered: 07/07/2021 12:52 PM]
June 30, 2021 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. Fee Paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 07/14/2021. Appellant's brief due on or before 08/09/2021 for Nate A. Lindell. [1] [7170480] [21-2221] (AD) [Entered: 07/01/2021 11:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nate Lindell v. Cathy Jess, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARK KARTMAN
Represented By: Eliot Held
Represented By: Jody J. Schmelzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CATHY JESS
Represented By: Eliot Held
Represented By: Jody J. Schmelzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GARY BOUGHTON
Represented By: Eliot Held
Represented By: Jody J. Schmelzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JIM SCHWOCHERT
Represented By: Eliot Held
Represented By: Jody J. Schmelzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: NATE A. LINDELL
Represented By: Nate A. Lindell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?