Jose Torres v. RRD Holding Company
| JOSE L. TORRES |
| RRD HOLDING COMPANY, d/b/a Rock River Disposal Services, Inc. |
| 21-2229 |
| July 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER re: Agreed motion for voluntary dismissal. [ # 10 ] This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [11][7181664] [21-2229] (PS) [Entered: 08/26/2021 12:29 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Motion filed by Appellant Jose L. Torres to dismiss case. [10] [7181606] [21-2229] (Khare, Mohit) [Entered: 08/26/2021 11:16 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 08/26/2021 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7181675-2] [7181675] [21-2229] (PS) [Entered: 08/26/2021 12:36 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, all proceedings in this appeal are STAYED pending further court order. Counsel for the Appellant and Appellee are directed to make a telephonic or electronic mail status report to the Circuit Mediation Office on or before 09/27/2021. This requirement may be satisfied by filing a motion under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) to dismiss the appeal. [7181313] [21-2229] (HTP) [Entered: 08/25/2021 10:28 AM]
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney James R. Pirages for Appellee RRD Holding Company has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [8] [7180275] [21-2229] (LJ) [Entered: 08/19/2021 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney James R. Pirages for Appellee RRD Holding Company. [7] [7177763] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [21-2229]--[Edited 08/09/2021 by FP to reflect that atty. Pirages is added to the docket.] (Pirages, James) [Entered: 08/06/2021 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Mohit Khare for Appellant Jose L. Torres has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [6] [7177669] [21-2229] (LJ) [Entered: 08/06/2021 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Evan J. Bonnett for Appellee RRD Holding Company has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [5] [7177630] [21-2229] (LJ) [Entered: 08/06/2021 11:13 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 09/09/2021 for Jose L. Torres. Appellee's brief due on or before 10/12/2021 for RRD Holding Company. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 11/02/2021 for Appellant Jose L. Torres. RJS [7173838] [21-2229] (ER) [Entered: 07/20/2021 09:26 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Monday, August 9, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. RJS. [3] [7173830] [21-2229] (ER) [Entered: 07/20/2021 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Jose L. Torres. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7172247] [21-2229] (AD) [Entered: 07/12/2021 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Transcript information sheet due by 07/15/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Jose L. Torres by 07/08/2021. Appellant's brief due on or before 08/10/2021 for Jose L. Torres. [1] [7170669] [21-2229] (AD) [Entered: 07/02/2021 10:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jose Torres v. RRD Holding Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JOSE L. TORRES | |
| Represented By: | Mohit Khare |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: RRD HOLDING COMPANY, d/b/a Rock River Disposal Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Evan J. Bonnett |
| Represented By: | James R. Pirages |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
