Victor Robinson v. R. Edwards, et al
VICTOR L. ROBINSON |
R. EDWARDS, MATTHEW SCULLION, DANE ESSER, SERGEANT SAYLOR and LEBBEUS BROWN |
21-2236 |
July 6, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. [4] [7179070] CMD [21-2236] (CG) [Entered: 08/13/2021 03:48 PM] |
Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Victor L. Robinson to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.. [3] [7178933] [21-2236]--[Edited 08/13/2021 by AP- to reflect correct filing] (AP) [Entered: 08/13/2021 11:10 AM] |
Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Anthony L. Broadbent, Melanie Kuslits, and Cory Giebel.[2] [7171351] [21-2236] (ZNS) [Entered: 07/07/2021 09:43 AM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Victor L. Robinson by 07/13/2021. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 08/05/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 07/20/2021. [1] [7171342] [21-2236] (ZNS) [Entered: 07/07/2021 09:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.