Manetirony Clervrain v. Connie Lawson, et al
| MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN |
| CONNIE LAWSON, MATT HURRELL, Director of the Bureau of Prisons and TODD YOUNG, United States Senator for Indiana |
| 21-2258 |
| July 8, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain for disqualifying judges act or judicial officials misconduct or performance by the national treaties act. [13] [7183454] [21-2258] (PS) [Entered: 09/03/2021 10:32 AM] |
Filing 12
ORDER re: 1. Motion for extraordinary remedy act or circumstances to compel process by the ANT(s) reform multiplicity act. 2. Motion for the panel or en banc or enforcing power against fiscal attacks by invoking the ANT(s) nationalities act. [ # 10 ] [ # 11 ] It is unclear what relief appellant Manetirony Clervrain seeks in his latest filings. To the extent that Clervrain requests more time to file a docketing statement, the motion is GRANTED, and Clervrain shall file the docketing statement on or before October 4, 2021. The clerk shall send Clervrain this courts instructions for preparing a docketing statement so he may familiarize himself with the information that must be included in a Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement. To the extent that Clervrain is arguing the merits of his appeal, he is reminded that such arguments should be included in his opening brief, if this case proceeds to briefing. Finally, a review of the courts docket indicates that on July 15, 2021, the district court denied Clervrains motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Clervrain is reminded that he must either pay the $505.00 filing fee in the district court or file a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the clerk of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for doing so is extended to October 4, 2021. MEK [12] [7183444] [21-2258] (PS) [Entered: 09/03/2021 10:11 AM]
|
| Filing 11 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain for the panel or en banc or enforcing power against ficially [sic] attacks by invoking the ANT nationalities act.. [11] [7182973] [21-2258] (MAN) [Entered: 09/01/2021 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain for extraordinary remedy act or circumstances to compel process by the ANT reform multiplicity act. [10] [7182971] [21-2258] (MAN) [Entered: 09/01/2021 03:59 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Manetirony Clervrain by 09/07/2021. [9] [7180706] [21-2258]--[Edited 08/23/2021 by AD to remove certified mail text.] (AD) [Entered: 08/23/2021 09:21 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: On consideration of the papers filed in this appeal and review of the short record, this appeal is LIMITED to a review of the orders entered on June 17, 2021, and June 30, 2021. This appeal is timely only as to the orders entered on June 17, 2021 (denying plaintiff Clervrains second set of post-judgment motions) and June 30, 2021 (sanctioning plaintiff Clervrain). Further, this appeal, as LIMITED by this order, shall proceed to a determination of appellants fee status on appeal. Appellant Manetirony Clervrain also is reminded that he must file the required Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement. Briefing remains SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [7177192] [21-2258] (AD) [Entered: 08/04/2021 03:42 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Manetirony Clervrain by 08/06/2021. [7] [7174665] [21-2258] (AD) [Entered: 07/23/2021 09:44 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER re: Motion for court action, which this court construes as motion to become an electronic filer. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. [ # 4 ] MEK [6] [7173491] [21-2258] (AP) [Entered: 07/16/2021 04:21 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 07/15/2021. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 08/16/2021 for Appellant Manetirony Clervrain [7173088] [5] [7173088] [21-2258] (AP) [Entered: 07/15/2021 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain for relief. [4] [7172748] [21-2258] (MAN) [Entered: 07/14/2021 10:57 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant, on or before July 22, 2021, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be LIMITED to a review of the orders entered on June 17, 2021, and June 30, 2021. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7171885] DW [3] [7171885] [21-2258] (AG) [Entered: 07/08/2021 04:46 PM]
|
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7171790] (Note: The Office of the US Attorney has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [21-2258] (ZNS) [Entered: 07/08/2021 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Manetirony Clervrain by 07/12/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 07/22/2021. [1] [7171787] [21-2258] (ZNS) [Entered: 07/08/2021 01:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
