John Tompkins v. Mark Sevier
| JOHN TOMPKINS |
| MARK R. SEVIER, Warden |
| 21-2259 |
| July 8, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motion for voluntary dismissal. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). The clerk shall transfer the appellants Petition for Certificate of Appealability included in the short record in this appeal to appeal no. 21-2276. The appellant will proceed in appeal no. 21-2276. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 6 ] [7] [7177677] [21-2259] (AG) [Entered: 08/06/2021 12:34 PM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 08/06/2021 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7177696-2] [7177696] [21-2259] (AG) [Entered: 08/06/2021 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant John Tompkins to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [6] [7176800] [21-2259] (MAN) [Entered: 08/03/2021 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant John Tompkins leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 07/19/2021. [5] [7175097] [21-2259] (JR) [Entered: 07/26/2021 12:42 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: TA preliminary review of the short record indicates that this appeal (actually, a paper captioned Petition for Certificate of Appealability which was treated as a notice of appeal) duplicates an appeal filed on the same day, and docketed in this court as Appeal No. 21-2276. Only one appeal is necessary, the other should be dismissed. Harris v. Bellin Memorial Hospital, 13 F.3d 1082, 1083 (7th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, petitioner-appellant John Tompkins shall file, on or before July 27, 2021, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed as unnecessary. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall remain suspended pending further court order. DW [7172618][3] [3] [7172618] [21-2259] (AD) [Entered: 07/13/2021 03:09 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [4] [7175096] [21-2259] (JR) [Entered: 07/26/2021 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant John Tompkins. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7171847] [21-2259] (AP) [Entered: 07/08/2021 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 05/26/2021. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 07/22/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant John Tompkins by 07/13/2021. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/22/2021 for Appellant John Tompkins. [1] [7171813] [21-2259] (FP) [Entered: 07/08/2021 02:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: John Tompkins v. Mark Sevier | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: JOHN TOMPKINS | |
| Represented By: | John Tompkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: MARK R. SEVIER, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Tyler Banks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
