Contrell Plummer v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
| CONTRELL PLUMMER |
| ROB JEFFREYS, Agency Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, DAVID MITCHELL, Warden Pinckneyville CC, NURSE NANCY, Pinckneyville CC and JOHN DOES, 1-4, C/O, Sgt., Lt., and Shift Commander, Pinckneyville CC |
| 21-2402 |
| August 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Contrell Plummer leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 08/25/2021. [4] [7181424] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/24/2021 [21-2402] (CM) [Entered: 08/25/2021 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [3] [7180910] [21-2402] (CM) [Entered: 08/23/2021 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7176597] [21-2402] (AD) [Entered: 08/02/2021 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 08/16/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Contrell Plummer by 08/09/2021. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/01/2021. [1] [7176589] [21-2402] (AD) [Entered: 08/02/2021 02:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
