Andrew Ruiz v. Alberto Butalid, et al
| ANDREW RUIZ |
| ALBERTO BUTALID, R. SCOTT THOMPSON, JOHN R. BALDWIN, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and DAVID MITCHELL |
| 21-2405 |
| August 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Andrew Ruiz leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 09/20/2021. District Court has assessed a $53.99 initial partial filing fee. [4] [7186802] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 10/20/2021. [21-2405] (CM) [Entered: 09/20/2021 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [3] [7186714] [21-2405] (CM) [Entered: 09/20/2021 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Timothy C. Sansone for Appellee Wexford Health Sources, Inc.. Additional Parties: Dr. Alberto Butalid. [2] [7177287] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [21-2405] --[Edited 08/05/2021 by MM to reflect addition of counsel.] (Sansone, Timothy) [Entered: 08/04/2021 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Andrew Ruiz by 08/09/2021. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/01/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 08/16/2021. [1] [7176720] [21-2405] (AG) [Entered: 08/03/2021 09:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
