Ronnie Jones v. Deanna Brookhart
| RONNIE JONES |
| DEANNA BROOKHART |
| 21-2419 |
| August 3, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [15] [7184794] [21-2419] (CM) [Entered: 09/10/2021 09:13 AM] |
Filing 14
ORDER re: Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 13 ][14][7184557] [21-2419] (MM) [Entered: 09/09/2021 11:40 AM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 09/09/2021 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7184571-2] [7184571] [21-2419] (MM) [Entered: 09/09/2021 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Ronnie Jones to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [13] [7184020] [21-2419] (CAH) [Entered: 09/07/2021 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed Response by Appellee Deanna Brookhart to Court order of August 31. [12][7183534] [21-2419] (Cebula, Michael) [Entered: 09/03/2021 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 11 Appearance form filed by Attorney Michael L. Cebula for Appellee Deanna Brookhart. [11] [7182749] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-2419] [Edited 09/01/2021 by CG to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Cebula, Michael) [Entered: 09/01/2021 09:18 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: On consideration of the PAPER filed by appellant on August 30, 2021, appellee shall file a response to appellants filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of August 4, 2021. DW Response due for Appellee Deanna Brookhart by 09/09/2021. [10] [7182641] [21-2419] (CMD) [Entered: 08/31/2021 03:07 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Ronnie Jones. [9] [7182340] [21-2419] (CAH) [Entered: 08/30/2021 03:50 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders petitioner-appellant Ronnie Jones to show cause for his failure to respond to the courts order of 08/04/2021. Petitioner-appellant Jones shall file his response on or before 09/09/2021. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk is directed to attach a copy of the courts order of 08/04/2021, to appellants copy of this order.Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0700 0000 6008 3371. DW [8] [7181768] [21-2419] (MM) [Entered: 08/26/2021 02:56 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motion to extend time to file. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED to the extent that any separate request for a certificate of appealability is due by September 21, 2021. In the event that the appellant does not file a motion by that date, his notice of appeal previously docketed in this court will be deemed to constitute an application for a certificate of appealability. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)(2). [ # 6 ]. CMD [7] [7181119] [21-2419] (AP) [Entered: 08/24/2021 01:40 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Ronnie Jones to extend time to file request for Certificate of Appealability. [6] [7180859] [21-2419] (CAH) [Entered: 08/23/2021 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Ronnie Jones leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 08/20/2021. [5] [7180541] [21-2380, 21-2419] (MM) [Entered: 08/20/2021 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 4 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [4] [7180210] [21-2380, 21-2419] (CG) [Entered: 08/19/2021 12:15 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant Ronnie Jones is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Ronnie Jones by 09/01/2021. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0700 0000 6008 3937. [3] [7179807] [21-2419] (AD) [Entered: 08/18/2021 08:59 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant shall , on or before August 18, 2021, file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or as unnecessary. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7177010] DW [2] [7177010] [21-2419] (AG) [Entered: 08/04/2021 09:31 AM]
|
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 06/21/2021. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 08/17/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Ronnie Jones by 08/04/2021. Fee or IFP forms due on 08/17/2021 for Appellant Ronnie Jones. [1] [7176897] [21-2419] (FP) [Entered: 08/03/2021 02:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ronnie Jones v. Deanna Brookhart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: RONNIE JONES | |
| Represented By: | Ronnie Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: DEANNA BROOKHART | |
| Represented By: | Michael M. Glick |
| Represented By: | Michael L. Cebula |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
