Ronnie Martin v. Timothy Gray, et al
| RONNIE MARTIN |
| TIMOTHY GRAY, TODD HIGGINS, Officer, RAYMOND TAYLOR and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 21-2460 |
| August 10, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney S. Michael Murphy for Appellees Todd Higgins and Raymond Taylor in 21-2460, 21-2234. [3] [7182832] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-2460, 21-2234]--[Edited 09/01/2021 by MM to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Murphy, Sean) [Entered: 09/01/2021 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed district court order dated 08/27/2021, IT IS ORDERED that Ronnie Martin provide the Court with his current contact information by 9/27/21. If he does not, the Court will dismiss this case based on Martin's failure to diligently prosecute it. See Civil L. R. 41(c). The Court CERTIFIES that Martin's [127] second notice of appeal is frivolous because he seeks to appeal non-appealable orders. [2] [7182018] [21-2460] (CM) [Entered: 08/27/2021 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 08/24/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Ronnie Martin by 08/16/2021. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/09/2021. [1] [7178432] [21-2460] (FP) [Entered: 08/11/2021 10:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
