Chet Smith v. City of Chicago, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHET SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF CHICAGO, CIVILIAN OFFICE OF POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY, DAVID BARR, JAY WESTENSEE and SYDNEY ROBERTS
Case Number: 21-2467
Filed: August 10, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2021 Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Chet Smith leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 09/20/2021. [4] [7186981] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 10/21/2021 [21-2467] (CM) [Entered: 09/21/2021 11:24 AM]
September 14, 2021 Filing 3 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [3] [7185494] [21-2467] (CM) [Entered: 09/14/2021 11:21 AM]
August 10, 2021 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7178550] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [21-2467] (FP) [Entered: 08/11/2021 04:13 PM]
August 10, 2021 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 08/24/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Chet Smith by 08/16/2021. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/09/2021. [1] [7178545] [21-2467] (FP) [Entered: 08/11/2021 04:05 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Chet Smith v. City of Chicago, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHET SMITH
Represented By: Chet Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF CHICAGO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CIVILIAN OFFICE OF POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID BARR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JAY WESTENSEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SYDNEY ROBERTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?