USA v. James Rogers
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
JAMES ROGERS |
21-2638 |
September 7, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant James Rogers. [2] [7184682] [21-2638] (Knepley, Jean) [Entered: 09/09/2021 03:23 PM] |
Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Docketing statement filed. Appellant's brief due on or before 10/18/2021 for James Rogers. Transcript information sheet due by 09/21/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant James Rogers by 09/14/2021. [1] [7184156] [21-2638] (CG) [Entered: 09/08/2021 09:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. James Rogers | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Abhishek Kambli |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: JAMES ROGERS | |
Represented By: | Michael J. Donahoe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.