Reginald Jones v. Montgomery Waterman, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: REGINALD JONES
Defendant / Appellee: MONTGOMERY WATERMAN, KEVIN CARTWRIGHT, Lieutenant, ANTHONY WILLS and JASON MORRIS
Case Number: 21-2700
Filed: September 16, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 6, 2022 Reginald Jones v. Montgomery Waterman

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2021 Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Reginald Jones to compel extension of time and court order for issuance of funds from trust account. [10] [7198735] [21-2700] (MAN) [Entered: 11/12/2021 11:14 AM]
November 12, 2021 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Reginald Jones to compel court intervention in payment of appeal fee and payments for transcript of preliminary and Pavey hearings. [9] [7198734] [21-2700] (MAN) [Entered: 11/12/2021 11:13 AM]
October 27, 2021 Filing 8 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Reginald Jones. [8] [7194994] [21-2700] (CG) [Entered: 10/27/2021 02:44 PM]
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re: Motion to extend time to pay filing fee for appeal and transcripts for proceedings. [ # 6 ]; This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status has not yet been determined. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED only to the extent that the appellant shall either pay the $505.00 filing fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and a PLRA memorandum in support with the clerk of this court by December 6, 2021. [7] [7191603] CMD [21-2700] (CG) [Entered: 10/13/2021 12:00 PM]
October 12, 2021 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Reginald Jones to extend time to pay filing fee for appeal and transcripts for proceedings. [6] [7191332] [21-2700] (CM) [Entered: 10/12/2021 03:19 PM]
October 8, 2021 Filing 5 Filed Notice of IFP motion to District Court by Appellant Reginald Jones. [5] [7190987] [21-2700] (CM) [Entered: 10/08/2021 02:26 PM]
October 5, 2021 Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Reginald Jones leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 10/05/2021. [4] [7190031] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/04/2021 [21-2700] (CM) [Entered: 10/05/2021 01:04 PM]
October 4, 2021 Filing 3 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [3] [7189771] [21-2700] (CM) [Entered: 10/04/2021 03:49 PM]
September 16, 2021 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Andrea Johnson; Michael Astin; Sgt. Anthony Jones; Zachary Fenton; Joseph Childers; Kyle Lindner; [2] [7186324] [21-2700] (FP) [Entered: 09/17/2021 11:20 AM]
September 16, 2021 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 09/30/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Reginald Jones by 09/23/2021. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 10/18/2021. [1] [7186302] [21-2700] (FP) [Entered: 09/17/2021 10:49 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Reginald Jones v. Montgomery Waterman, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: REGINALD JONES
Represented By: Reginald Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MONTGOMERY WATERMAN
Represented By: Nadine J. Wichern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KEVIN CARTWRIGHT, Lieutenant
Represented By: Nadine J. Wichern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANTHONY WILLS
Represented By: Nadine J. Wichern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JASON MORRIS
Represented By: Nadine J. Wichern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?