Andrew Slabon v. Angelo Sanchez, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDREW SLABON
Defendant / Appellee: ANGELO R. SANCHEZ, #16511, DAVID J. CUMMENS, #2730, JERRY J. ADAMSKI, #7822, MORRIS F. BISHOP, #20787 and PRESENCE OUR LADY OF THE RESURRECTION MEDICAL CENTER
Case Number: 21-2729
Filed: September 21, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 15, 2023 Andrew Slabon v. Angelo Sanchez

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: The motion for permission to file electronically is DENIED. The motion to waive PACER fees is GRANTED. To avoid an unreasonable burden on appellant and to promote public access to information, appellant is exempted from fees for the use of the PACER system in this appeal. The clerk of this court shall provide the PACER Service Center with a copy of this order. [ # 9 ] [ # 10 ] JPK [13] [7197587] [21-2729] (ER) [Entered: 11/08/2021 10:29 AM]
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 8 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 12/01/2021 for Andrew Slabon. Appellees' briefs due on or before 01/03/2022 for Jerry J. Adamski, Morris F. Bishop, David J. Cummens, Presence Our Lady of the Resurrection Medical Center and Angelo R. Sanchez. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 01/24/2022 for Appellant Andrew Slabon. CMD [12] [7196083] [21-2729] (PS) [Entered: 11/01/2021 02:43 PM]
November 1, 2021 Filing 11 Filed Certificate of Service to motion for extension of time, motion to become an electronic filer, and motion to waive fees filed on 11/01/2021 by Appellant Mr. Andrew Slabon. [11] [7195970] [21-2729] (CAH) [Entered: 11/01/2021 11:48 AM]
November 1, 2021 Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Andrew Slabon to waive all fees for viewing and filing electronically through the Court's PACER system. [10] [7195969] [21-2729] (CAH) [Entered: 11/01/2021 11:47 AM]
November 1, 2021 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Andrew Slabon to become an electronic filer. [9] [7195968] [21-2729] (CAH) [Entered: 11/01/2021 11:45 AM]
November 1, 2021 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Andrew Slabon to extend time to file appellant's brief. [8] [7195967] [21-2729] (CAH) [Entered: 11/01/2021 11:44 AM]
October 21, 2021 Filing 7 Appearance form filed by Attorney Ellen McLaughlin for Appellees Jerry J. Adamski, Morris F. Bishop, David J. Cummens and Angelo R. Sanchez. Additional Parties: City of Chicago, Timothy O'Brien. [7] [7193656] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-2729] [7] [7193656] [21-2729]--[Edited 10/21/2021 by HTP to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (McLaughlin, Ellen) [Entered: 10/21/2021 02:09 PM]
October 4, 2021 Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Sir Andrew Slabon. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7189613] [21-2729] (AD) [Entered: 10/04/2021 10:57 AM]
September 23, 2021 Filing 5 Appearance form filed by Attorney MYRIAM ZRECZNY KASPER for Appellees Jerry J. Adamski, Morris F. Bishop, David J. Cummens and Angelo R. Sanchez. Additional Parties: CITY OF CHICAGO; TIMOTHY O'BRIEN; and QUENTIN D. STRONG. [5] [7187587] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-2729] [5] [7187587] [21-2729]--[Edited 09/23/2021 by ER - terminated Attorney Brian J. Wilson and added Attorney Myriam Zreczny Kasper] (Kasper, Myriam) [Entered: 09/23/2021 11:46 AM]
September 23, 2021 Filing 4 Attorney Kaitlyn M. O'Boye for Presence Our Lady of the Resurrection Medical Center in 21-2729 terminated and added Attorney(s) Julie Ann Teuscher for party(s) Appellee Presence Our Lady of the Resurrection Medical Center, in case 21-2729 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Julie A. Teuscher for Appellee Presence Our Lady of the Resurrection Medical Center. [4] [7187572] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-2729]--[Edited 09/23/2021 by AD to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Teuscher, Julie) [Entered: 09/23/2021 11:03 AM]
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than oneappellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee=s brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres,170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). DW [7187439] [3] [7187439] [21-2729] (CG) [Entered: 09/22/2021 03:36 PM]
September 21, 2021 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: City of Chicago, Timothy O'Brien, and Quentin D. Strong. [2] [7187333] [21-2729] (HTP) [Entered: 09/22/2021 12:35 PM]
September 21, 2021 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Andrew Slabon by 09/27/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 10/05/2021. Appellant's brief due on or before 11/01/2021 for Andrew Slabon. [1] [7187315] [21-2729] (HTP) [Entered: 09/22/2021 12:05 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Andrew Slabon v. Angelo Sanchez, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ANDREW SLABON
Represented By: Andrew Slabon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANGELO R. SANCHEZ, #16511
Represented By: Myriam Z. Kasper
Represented By: Ellen W. McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID J. CUMMENS, #2730
Represented By: Myriam Z. Kasper
Represented By: Ellen W. McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JERRY J. ADAMSKI, #7822
Represented By: Myriam Z. Kasper
Represented By: Ellen W. McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MORRIS F. BISHOP, #20787
Represented By: Myriam Z. Kasper
Represented By: Ellen W. McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PRESENCE OUR LADY OF THE RESURRECTION MEDICAL CENTER
Represented By: Julie Ann Teuscher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?