Eddie Hatch, Jr., et al v. City of Milwaukee, et al
| EDDIE L. HATCH, JR. and MICHELLE DAVIS-HATCH |
| CITY OF MILWAUKEE, TOM BARRETT, JEFF HANEWALL, ANGELIQUE L. SHARPE, CHRISTOPHER LAURENT and WILLIE SMITH |
| 21-2805 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Eddie Hatch, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 15 copies Appellant's brief filed by Appellants Michelle Davis-Hatch and Eddie L. Hatch, Jr.. Appellee's brief due on or before 12/17/2021 for Tom Barrett, City of Milwaukee, Jeff Hanewall, Christopher Laurent, Angelique L. Sharpe and Willie Smith. Disk not required. [9] [7199875] [21-2805] (CAH) [Entered: 11/17/2021 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Michael S. Murray for Appellee Angelique L. Sharpe. for Havenwoods HEDC/BID #31 (more properly identified as Havenwoods Economic Development Corporation), BID #31, and Stephanie Harling. [8] [7194583] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [21-2805] (Murray, Michael) [Entered: 10/26/2021 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Certificate of Service to Appearance & Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement filed on 10/26/2021 by Appellee Angelique L. Sharpe. [7] [7194580] [21-2805] (Murray, Michael) [Entered: 10/26/2021 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Certificate of Service to Appearance & Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement filed on 10/19/2021 by Appellee Christopher Laurent. [6] [7193019] [21-2805] (Baker, Eric) [Entered: 10/19/2021 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Attorney Eric A. Baker d/b/a Wisconsin Dealer Law for Appellee Christopher Laurent. for Cinnaire Solutions; James Dow. [5] [7193002] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [21-2805] (Baker, Eric) [Entered: 10/19/2021 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Michael J. Progar for Appellee Jeff Hanewall. [4] [7190979] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [21-2805] (Progar, Michael) [Entered: 10/08/2021 02:20 PM] |
Filing 3
Order issued A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7190658] DW [3] [7190658] [21-2805] (AD) [Entered: 10/07/2021 02:15 PM]
|
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Stephanie Harling, Ashanti Hamilton, James Starks, Sakuri Fears, Andrea Pratt, Cinnaire Solutions, James Dow, Howard Snyder, Department of City Development, Dwayne K. Edwards, Matt Haessly, Amy E. Turim, Ken Little, Martha Brown, Vanessa Koster, NWSCDC, and Havenwoods HEDC/BID #31. [2] [7189936] [21-2805] (AG) [Entered: 10/05/2021 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. Appellants' brief due on or before 11/15/2021 for Michelle Davis-Hatch and Eddie L. Hatch Jr. [1] [7189933] [21-2805] (AG) [Entered: 10/05/2021 10:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
