Allen Calligan v. Frank Vanihel
Petitioner / Appellant: ALLEN CALLIGAN
Respondent / Appellee: FRANK VANIHEL
Case Number: 21-2806
Filed: October 4, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: This appeal (21-2806) proceed to a ruling on appellants motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and to a determination whether a certificate of appealability should issue. Briefing remains SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). DW [7197041] [21-2806] (HTP) [Entered: 11/04/2021 12:49 PM]
October 28, 2021 Filing 7 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellee Frank Vanihel. [7] [7195259] [21-2806] (Templeton, Caroline) [Entered: 10/28/2021 11:56 AM]
October 27, 2021 Filing 6 Prose motion filed by Appellant Allen Calligan to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [6] [7194967] [21-2806] (CM) [Entered: 10/27/2021 02:06 PM]
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: On consideration of the Appellants Response Stating Why this Appeal Should Not be Dismissed filed by petitioner-appellant on 10/21/2021, appellee shall file, on or before 10/29/2021, a response to petitioner-appellants filing, addressing the issue raised in the courts order of 10/06/2021. DW [5] [7193947] [21-2806] (MM) [Entered: 10/22/2021 02:16 PM]
October 21, 2021 Filing 4 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Allen Calligan. [4] [7193696] [21-2806] (CAH) [Entered: 10/21/2021 03:00 PM]
October 12, 2021 Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Allen Calligan leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 10/12/2021. The court DENIES the motion for a certificate of appealability. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/12/2021 for Appellant Allen Calligan. Forwarded to MPB. [7191227] [3] [7191227] [21-2806] (AP) [Entered: 10/12/2021 12:02 PM]
October 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: The appellant shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed as unnecessary. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall remain SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). DW [7190346][2] Memorandum due for Appellant Allen Calligan by 10/20/2021. [2] [7190346] [21-2806] (HTP) [Entered: 10/06/2021 12:03 PM]
October 4, 2021 Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 08/31/2021. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. [1] [7189955] [21-2806] (ER) [Entered: 10/05/2021 11:08 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Allen Calligan v. Frank Vanihel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ALLEN CALLIGAN
Represented By: Allen Calligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: FRANK VANIHEL
Represented By: Caroline Templeton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?