Michelle Marksi v. Courier Express One, Incorpora, et al
MICHELLE MARKSI |
COURIER EXPRESS ONE, INCORPORATED, PRECC, INCORPORATED, PREMIER CC, LLC, VERTEK, LLC and DISPATCH EXPRESS, INCORPORATED |
21-2898 |
October 15, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Jon D. Hoag for Appellee PreCC, Incorporated has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [9] [7202184] [21-2898] (LJ) [Entered: 11/30/2021 11:17 AM] |
Filing 8 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 01/18/2022 for Michelle Marksi. Appellees' briefs due on or before 02/18/2022 for Courier Express One, Incorporated, Dispatch Express, Incorporated, PreCC, Incorporated, Premier CC, LLC and Vertek, LLC. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/11/2022 for Appellant Michelle Marksi. RJS [7197895] [21-2898] (ER) [Entered: 11/08/2021 04:13 PM] |
Filing 7 Amended Jurisdictional Statement filed by Appellant Michelle Marksi. [7] [7196213] [21-2898] (Smith, Zane) [Entered: 11/01/2021 05:03 PM] |
Filing 6 ORDER: Attorney Zane D. Smith for Appellant Michelle Marksi shall show cause for his failure to respond to the court's order of 10/18/21. Attorney Smith shall file his response on or before 11/4/21. Counsel is advised that failure to respond may result in monetary or disciplinary sanctions. DW [6] [7195405] [21-2898] (ER) [Entered: 10/28/2021 03:18 PM] |
Filing 5 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 12/06/2021 for Michelle Marksi. Appellees' briefs due on or before 01/05/2022 for Courier Express One, Incorporated, Dispatch Express, Incorporated, PreCC, Incorporated, Premier CC, LLC and Vertek, LLC. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 01/26/2022 for Appellant Michelle Marksi. RJS [7194040] [21-2898] (CG) [Entered: 10/22/2021 04:52 PM] |
Filing 4 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Friday November 5, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. RJS. [4] [7194034] [21-2898] (CG) [Entered: 10/22/2021 04:39 PM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7192708] DW [3] [7192708] [21-2898] (AG) [Entered: 10/18/2021 04:08 PM] |
Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant shall file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the omitted information. The statement is due on or before October 25, 2021. (See order for details) DW [2] [7192705] [21-2898] (ER) [Entered: 10/18/2021 04:02 PM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 10/29/2021. Appellant's brief due on or before 11/24/2021 for Michelle Marksi. [1] [7192564] [21-2898] (FP) [Entered: 10/18/2021 12:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.