Billy Tyler v. Barb Bocik, et al
| BILLY TYLER |
| BARB BOCIK and JANE DOE |
| 21-2900 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(c). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [4] [7202404] [21-2900] (AD) [Entered: 12/01/2021 08:47 AM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 12/01/2021 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7202414-2] [7202414] [21-2900] (AD) [Entered: 12/01/2021 08:58 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant Billy Tyler is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Billy Tyler by 11/16/2021. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0700 0000 6008 4385. [3] [7196302] [21-2900] (AD) [Entered: 11/02/2021 10:03 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Billy Tyler leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 10/21/2021. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/19/2021 for Appellant Billy Tyler [7193367] [2] [7193367] [21-2900] (CG) [Entered: 10/20/2021 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Billy Tyler by 10/25/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 11/01/2021. [1] [7192608] [21-2900] (AP) [Entered: 10/18/2021 02:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
