Daniel Koch, et al v. Jerry W. Bailey Trucking, Inc., et al
| DANIEL KOCH, JOHNNY R. WELLS, JR., TRENT COLLINS, BRAD WEIKART and FRANKLIN LORTIE |
| JERRY W. BAILEY TRUCKING, INC. and JERRY W. BAILEY |
| 21-2952 |
| October 25, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Koch v. Jerry W. Bailey Trucking, Inc.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellants' brief due on or before 01/18/2022 for Trent Collins, Daniel Koch, Franklin Lortie, Brad Weikart and Johnny R. Wells Jr.. Appellees' brief due on or before 02/17/2022 for Jerry W. Bailey and Jerry W. Bailey Trucking, Inc.. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/10/2022 for Appellants Trent Collins, Daniel Koch, Franklin Lortie, Brad Weikart and Johnny R. Wells Jr. JB [7203036] [21-2952] (HTP) [Entered: 12/03/2021 09:13 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Theodore T. Storer for Appellees Jerry W. Bailey and Jerry W. Bailey Trucking, Inc.. [8] [7199206] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [21-2952] (Storer, Theodore) [Entered: 11/15/2021 03:24 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellants' brief due on or before 01/04/2022 for Trent Collins, Daniel Koch, Franklin Lortie, Brad Weikart and Johnny R. Wells Jr. Appellees' brief due on or before 02/04/2022 for Jerry W. Bailey and Jerry W. Bailey Trucking, Inc. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 02/25/2022 for Appellants Trent Collins, Daniel Koch, Franklin Lortie, Brad Weikart and Johnny R. Wells Jr. JB [7197664] [21-2952] (MM) [Entered: 11/08/2021 12:15 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 2:00p.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JB [6] [7197662] [21-2952] (MM) [Entered: 11/08/2021 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants Daniel Koch, Trent Collins, Franklin Lortie, Brad Weikart and Johnny R. Wells, Jr.. [5] [7197493] [21-2952] (Weldy, Ronald) [Entered: 11/08/2021 06:27 AM] |
| Filing 4 Statement of Jurisdiction filed by Appellants Johnny R. Wells, Jr., Brad Weikart, Franklin Lortie, Daniel Koch and Trent Collins. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7196597] [21-2952] (Weldy, Ronald) [Entered: 11/02/2021 06:56 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellants shall file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the date that the Rule 58 merits judgment was entered. The statement is due on or before 11/02/2021. (See order for further details). DW [3] [7194684] [21-2952] (MM) [Entered: 10/26/2021 03:08 PM]
|
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLANTS: Kirk Herring, Zackery Pepple, Danny Porter, Timothy Niblack, Tom Seitz, Sr. and Anthony Follis. [2] [7194497] [21-2952] (MM) [Entered: 10/26/2021 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 11/08/2021. Appellants' brief due on or before 12/06/2021 for Trent Collins, Daniel Koch, Franklin Lortie, Brad Weikart and Johnny R. Wells Jr. [1] [7194494] [21-2952] (MM) [Entered: 10/26/2021 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
