Luke Prindable v. St. Clair County, Illinois, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: LUKE A. PRINDABLE
Defendant / Appellee: ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILSON, RICHARD WATSON, CITY OF BELLEVILLE and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SIMS
Case Number: 21-3031
Filed: November 1, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2021 Filing 10 Filed Appellant Luke A. Prindable Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [10] [7207198] [21-3031] (MAN) [Entered: 12/23/2021 02:29 PM]
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings will remain suspended until the appellant's fee status has been determined. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that on November 15, 2021, and on December 7, 2021, the appellant filed motions to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with this court. The paperwork is incomplete, however, because it does not include a PLRA memorandum in support. Accordingly, the appellant shall file the required PLRA memorandum by January 10, 2022. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this appeal. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0001 4853 8876. [9] [7203802] CMD [21-3031] (AD) [Entered: 12/07/2021 02:53 PM]
December 7, 2021 Filing 8 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Luke A. Prindable. [8] [7203751] [21-3031] (LCP) [Entered: 12/07/2021 01:45 PM]
December 7, 2021 Filing 7 Prose motion filed by Appellant Luke A. Prindable to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [7] [7203749] [21-3031] (LCP) [Entered: 12/07/2021 01:43 PM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Luke A. Prindable. (Forwarded from the District Court). [6] [7199000] [21-3031] (CAG) [Entered: 11/15/2021 08:32 AM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Luke A. Prindable to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. (Forwarded from the District Court). [5] [7198999] [21-3031] (CAG) [Entered: 11/15/2021 08:31 AM]
November 5, 2021 Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Luke A. Prindable leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 11/04/2021. [4] [7197263] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 12/06/2021 [21-3031] (CAG) [Entered: 11/05/2021 09:50 AM]
November 1, 2021 Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: John Doe; [3] [7196341] [21-3031] (FP) [Entered: 11/02/2021 11:01 AM]
November 1, 2021 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7196292] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [21-3031] (FP) [Entered: 11/02/2021 09:53 AM]
November 1, 2021 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Transcript information sheet due by 11/15/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Luke A. Prindable by 11/08/2021. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 12/01/2021. [1] [7196286] [21-3031] (FP) [Entered: 11/02/2021 09:46 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Luke Prindable v. St. Clair County, Illinois, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LUKE A. PRINDABLE
Represented By: Luke A. Prindable
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RICHARD WATSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF BELLEVILLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SIMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?