Howard Smallwood v. Don Williams, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: HOWARD SMALLWOOD
Defendant / Appellee: DON WILLIAMS, Correctional Officer, BOYD LUNSFORD, Officer, CORY CONLON, Correctional Officer, ERICK HAMMOND, Correctional Officer and PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor
Case Number: 21-3129
Filed: November 15, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Review of the district courts docket shows that the appellant filed two pro se notices of appeal challenging the district courts judgment and this appeal is duplicative of appeal no. 21-3047. Accordingly, no appellate filing fee shall be imposed for this appeal. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [8][7205348] [21-3129] (AD) [Entered: 12/15/2021 10:01 AM]
December 15, 2021 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 12/15/2021 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7205353-2] [7205353] [21-3129] (AD) [Entered: 12/15/2021 10:17 AM]
December 13, 2021 Filing 7 Motion filed by Appellant Howard Smallwood to dismiss case. [7] [7204767] [21-3129] (Dillon, Rosalind) [Entered: 12/13/2021 10:47 AM]
December 10, 2021 Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Devi M. Rao for Appellant Howard Smallwood. [6] [7204593] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [21-3129] [Edited 12/10/2021 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Rao, Devi) [Entered: 12/10/2021 02:38 PM]
December 10, 2021 Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Rosalind Dillon for Appellant Howard Smallwood. [5] [7204588] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-3129] [Edited 12/10/2021 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Dillon, Rosalind) [Entered: 12/10/2021 02:36 PM]
December 1, 2021 Filing 4 ENTRY REMOVED AS ENTERED IN ERROR. FILED NOTICE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT THAT THE $505.00 APPELLATE FEE WAS RECEIVED. (Removed to reflect corrected case number, per the District Court). [4][7202555] [21-3129]--[Edited 12/02/2021 by CM] (CAG) [Entered: 12/01/2021 01:37 PM]
November 16, 2021 Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Howard Smallwood leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 11/16/2021. [3] [7199620] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 12/16/2021 [21-3129] (CAG) [Entered: 11/16/2021 04:04 PM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Robert Daugherty and Wexford of Indiana LLC [2] [7199382] [21-3129] (AG) [Entered: 11/16/2021 09:55 AM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Howard Smallwood by 11/24/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 11/29/2021. [1] [7199376] [21-3129] (AG) [Entered: 11/16/2021 09:48 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Howard Smallwood v. Don Williams, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: HOWARD SMALLWOOD
Represented By: Howard Smallwood
Represented By: Rosalind E. Dillon
Represented By: Devi M. Rao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DON WILLIAMS, Correctional Officer
Represented By: Aaron T. Craft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BOYD LUNSFORD, Officer
Represented By: Aaron T. Craft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CORY CONLON, Correctional Officer
Represented By: Aaron T. Craft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ERICK HAMMOND, Correctional Officer
Represented By: Aaron T. Craft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor
Represented By: Douglass R. Bitner
Represented By: Rachel Dubin Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?