David Vida v. Mark Williams
DAVID VIDAL and DAVID VIDA |
CHRISTINE BRANNON-DORTCH, Warden and MARK WILLIAMS |
21-3132 |
November 15, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [18] [7210776] [21-3132] (AP) [Entered: 01/13/2022 09:05 AM] |
Filing 17 Appellee Christine Brannon-Dortch substituted by Appellee Mark Williams, pursuant to FRAP 43(c), per information included in the docketing statement filed on 01/12/2022. [17] [7210472] [21-3132] (MM) [Entered: 01/12/2022 08:58 AM] |
Filing 16 Corrected Docketing Statement filed by Appellee Christine Brannon-Dortch. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [16] [7210465] [21-3132]--[Edited 01/12/2022 by MM to reflect document title.] (Levin, Eric) [Entered: 01/12/2022 08:40 AM] |
Filing 15 Appearance form filed by Attorney Eric M. Levin for Appellee Christine Brannon-Dortch. [15] [7210389] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [21-3132] [15] [7210389] [21-3132]--[Edited 01/11/2022 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Levin, Eric) [Entered: 01/11/2022 02:46 PM] |
Terminated Attorney Michael M. Glick for Brittany Greene in 21-2998, David Gomez in 21-3130, Christine Brannon-Dortch in 21-3132, David Gomez in 21-3134 and John Burle in 21-3147 and added Attorney(s) Katherine M. Doersch for party(s) Appellee Brittany Greene, in case 21-2998 Attorney(s) Katherine M. Doersch for party(s) Appellee John Burle, in case 21-3147 Attorney(s) Katherine M. Doersch for party(s) Appellee David Gomez, in case 21-3134 Attorney(s) Katherine M. Doersch for party(s) Appellee Christine Brannon-Dortch, in case 21-3132 Attorney(s) Katherine M. Doersch for party(s) Appellee David Gomez, in case 21-3130 pursuant to notification from the Office of the Illinois Attorney General regarding counsel of record. [7209231-2] [7209231] [21-2998, 21-3130, 21-3132, 21-3134, 21-3147] (CMD) [Entered: 01/06/2022 11:59 AM] |
Filing 14 ORDER re: Letter. [ # 10 ] A review of the courts docket indicates that on January 4, 2022, the clerk received the appellants docketing statement and motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and accepted both for filing. This appeal is proceeding to resolution of the appellants fee status and to a determination of whether a certificate of appealability should issue. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the courts public docket. CMD [14] [7208725] [21-3132] (PS) [Entered: 01/04/2022 03:07 PM] |
Filing 13 Order issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [13] [7208705] [21-3132] (CG) [Entered: 01/04/2022 02:49 PM] |
Filing 12 Prose motion filed by Appellant David Vida to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [12] [7208685] [21-3132] (CAH) [Entered: 01/04/2022 02:10 PM] |
Filing 11 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant David Vida. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [11] [7208684] [21-3132] (CAH) [Entered: 01/04/2022 02:09 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed letter from Appellant David Vida regarding docketing statement and IFP motion. [10] [7208679] [21-3132] (MAN) [Entered: 01/04/2022 01:53 PM] |
Filing 9 ORDER: Appellant David Vida is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant David Vida by 01/12/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0002 1930 2740. [9] [7207817] [21-3132] (AD) [Entered: 12/29/2021 09:18 AM] |
Filing 8 ORDER re: Motion for enlargement of time. [ # 7 ] The motion is GRANTED. The appellant shall either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the clerk of the district court by January 28, 2022. CMD [8] [7207608] [21-3132] (PS) [Entered: 12/28/2021 11:04 AM] |
Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant David Vida to extend time to file the in forma pauperis forms. [7] [7207476] [21-3132] (CAG) [Entered: 12/27/2021 03:45 PM] |
Filing 6 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 01/10/2022 for Appellant David Vida. [6] [7207437] [21-3132] (AG) [Entered: 12/27/2021 02:32 PM] |
Filing 5 ORDER re: Motion for enlargement of time. The motion is GRANTED. The appellant shall either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the clerk of the district court by December 16, 2021. [ # 4 ] SCR [5] [7203258] [21-3132] (ER) [Entered: 12/03/2021 04:05 PM] |
Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant David Vida for an extension of time. [4] [7203214] [21-3132] (CAG) [Entered: 12/03/2021 02:50 PM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant David Vida is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant David Vida by 12/15/2021. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0001 4853 8814. [3] [7202388] [21-3132] (AD) [Entered: 12/01/2021 08:21 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed District Court order dated 11/18/2021, motion to alter or amend judgment is DENIED. Forwarded to Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [2] [7200347] [21-3132] (CAH) [Entered: 11/19/2021 11:34 AM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 10/12/2021. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 11/29/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant David Vidal by 11/22/2021. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/29/2021 for Appellant David Vidal. [1] [7199399] [21-3132] (AD) [Entered: 11/16/2021 10:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.