Lukner Rene v. Andrew Ciolli
| LUKNER RENE |
| ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden |
| 21-3143 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Lukner Rene leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 12/20/2021. [6] [7206436] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 01/20/2022 [21-3143] (CAG) [Entered: 12/21/2021 09:01 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal and prisoner trust account statement to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [5] [7204937] [21-3143] (MM) [Entered: 12/13/2021 03:32 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant Lukner Rene to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7204880] [21-3143] (CAH) [Entered: 12/13/2021 02:38 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re: Motion for extension of time. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant has not yet either paid the $505.00 appellate fees or filed a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the district court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant shall either pay the $505.00 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court by January 14, 2022. The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellant shall file the Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement with this court by January 14, 2022. The clerk shall send the appellant this courts instructions for preparing a docketing statement so the appellant may familiarize himself with the information that must be included in a Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement. CMD [3] [7204368] CMD [21-3143] (AG) [Entered: 12/09/2021 03:54 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Lukner Rene for extension of time. [2] [7204280] [21-3143] (LCP) [Entered: 12/09/2021 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Lukner Rene by 11/23/2021. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 12/16/2021. Transcript information sheet due by 11/30/2021. [1] [7199693] [21-3143] (ER) [Entered: 11/17/2021 09:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lukner Rene v. Andrew Ciolli | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: LUKNER RENE | |
| Represented By: | Lukner Rene |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Scott Paccagnini |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
