Terrell McGee v. Rob Jeffreys
TERRELL MCGEE |
ROB JEFFREYS |
21-3260 |
December 6, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellee Rob Jeffreys. [13] [7212626] [21-3260] (Fischer, Garson) [Entered: 01/21/2022 03:00 PM] |
Filing 12 Appearance form filed by Attorney Garson S. Fischer for Appellee Rob Jeffreys. [12] [7212333] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [21-3260]--[Edited 01/21/2022 by FP to reflect that atty. Doersch is termed and atty. Fischer is added to the docket.] (Fischer, Garson) [Entered: 01/20/2022 03:40 PM] |
Filing 11 ORDER re: Papers. The appellee shall file, on or before January 20, 2022, a brief memorandum addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the court's order of December 7, 2021. DW [11] [7210379] [21-3260] (AP) [Entered: 01/11/2022 02:28 PM] |
Terminated Attorney Michael M. Glick for David Gomez in 21-3162, David Gomez in 21-3215, Rob Jeffreys in 21-3260, Brad Jonson in 21-3325 and Marlo Butler-Jones in 21-3399 and added Attorney(s) Katherine M. Doersch for party(s) Appellee Rob Jeffreys, in case 21-3260 Attorney(s) Katherine M. Doersch for party(s) Appellee David Gomez, in case 21-3215 Attorney(s) Katherine M. Doersch for party(s) Appellee Brad Jonson, in case 21-3325 Attorney(s) Katherine M. Doersch for party(s) Respondent Marlo Butler-Jones, in case 21-3399 Attorney(s) Katherine M. Doersch for party(s) Appellee David Gomez, in case 21-3162 pursuant to notification from the Office of the Illinois Attorney General regarding counsel of record. [7209232-2] [7209232] [21-3162, 21-3215, 21-3260, 21-3325, 21-3399] (CMD) [Entered: 01/06/2022 12:06 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Terrell McGee leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 12/22/2021. Per this Courts Order [36], Terrell McGee (Mr. McGee), who filed the Motion for Recruitment of Counsel [31] and the instant Motion for Leave to Appeal on forma pauperis [38], is not the same individual as Petitioner Terrell McGee (Petitioner) who filed this petition in this Court in 1993. Since Mr. McGee and Petitioner are not the same person, Mr. McGee cannot proceed in forma pauperis in this matter. Accordingly, [38] is DENIED. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 01/21/2022 for Appellant Terrell McGee [7206887] [10] [7206887] [21-3260] (AP) [Entered: 12/22/2021 02:12 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed District Court order dated 12/16/2021, denying motion for appointment of counsel in light of Mr. McGee and Petitioner not being the same person. The court directs the Clerk of the District Court to send the petitioner's original petition and the order affirming the state court judgment to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals as it relates to Appeal No. 21-3260. Forwarded to DW. [9] [7205898] [21-3260] (CMD) [Entered: 12/17/2021 10:18 AM] |
Filing 8 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [8] [7205894] [21-3260] (AP) [Entered: 12/17/2021 10:14 AM] |
Filing 7 Order issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [7] [7205785] [21-3260] (CG) [Entered: 12/16/2021 03:33 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Terrell McGee Brief Memorandum. [6] [7205751] [21-3260] (MAN) [Entered: 12/16/2021 02:34 PM] |
Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Terrell McGee to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7205749] [21-3260] (MAN) [Entered: 12/16/2021 02:34 PM] |
Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Terrell McGee to appear. [4] [7205748] [21-3260] (MAN) [Entered: 12/16/2021 02:33 PM] |
Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Terrell McGee. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7205747] [21-3260] (MAN) [Entered: 12/16/2021 02:33 PM] |
Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Terrell McGee, on or before December 21, 2021, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). [7203831] DW [2] [7203831] [21-3260] (HTP) [Entered: 12/07/2021 03:42 PM] |
Filing 1 Federal Prisoner State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability pending. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 12/21/2021. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Terrell McGee by 12/13/2021. Fee or IFP forms due on 12/21/2021 for Appellant Terrell McGee. [1] [7203714] [21-3260] (FP) [Entered: 12/07/2021 12:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Terrell McGee v. Rob Jeffreys | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: TERRELL MCGEE | |
Represented By: | Terrell McGee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: ROB JEFFREYS | |
Represented By: | Michael M. Glick |
Represented By: | Garson Fischer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.