Douglas Martin v. OSHA
| DOUGLAS P. MARTIN |
| OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION |
| 21-3284 |
| December 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Petition for Review docketed with proof of service, pursuant to FRAP 15(c). Fee due. Agency record or certified list due by 01/18/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 12/23/2021 for Petitioner Douglas P. Martin. [1] [7204298] [21-3284] (CG) [Entered: 12/09/2021 12:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Douglas Martin v. OSHA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DOUGLAS P. MARTIN | |
| Represented By: | Douglas P. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION | |
| Represented By: | Charles F. James |
| Represented By: | Heather Phillips |
| Represented By: | Thomas Tso |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
