Ramon Alvarado, Jr. v. Torria Van Buren
| RAMON ALVARADO, JR. |
| TORRIA VAN BUREN |
| 22-1064 |
| January 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Appellant Ramon Alvarado, Jr. is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Ramon Alvarado Jr. by 03/23/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0002 1930 4096. [7] [7221913] [22-1064] (AD) [Entered: 03/09/2022 10:54 AM]
|
| Filing 6 ***PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT PARTIAL FILING FEE. Received: $48.10 from Appellant Ramon Alvarado, Jr. on 03/07/2022. [6] [7221276] [22-1064] (CAG) [Entered: 03/07/2022 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed district court order dated 03/01/2022, Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Pay the Initial Partial Filing Fee. For good cause, I will GRANT the motion. The plaintiff must pay the initial partial filing fee for his appeal by April 4, 2022. [5] [7221227] [22-1064] (CAG) [Entered: 03/07/2022 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Ramon Alvarado, Jr. leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 02/03/2022. District Court has assessed a $48.10 initial partial filing fee. Motion for Leave to Appeal Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee; denying Motion to Supplement. Plaintiff's motion to supplement the record is DENIED. [4] [7215257] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 03/07/2022. [22-1064] (CAG) [Entered: 02/03/2022 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney Michael D. Morris for Appellee Torria Van Buren. [3] [7215120] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [22-1064]--[Edited 02/03/2022 by PS - to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Morris, Michael) [Entered: 02/03/2022 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 2 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [2] [7215079] [22-1064] (CAG) [Entered: 02/03/2022 08:36 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Ramon Alvarado Jr. by 01/26/2022. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 02/14/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 01/28/2022. [1] [7211491] [22-1064] (AG) [Entered: 01/18/2022 10:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ramon Alvarado, Jr. v. Torria Van Buren | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: RAMON ALVARADO, JR. | |
| Represented By: | Ramon Alvarado Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: TORRIA VAN BUREN | |
| Represented By: | Eliot M. Held |
| Represented By: | Michael D. Morris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
