Manetirony Clervrain v. Kilolo Kijakazi, et al
| MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN |
| DAN RUSYNIAK, MICHAEL A. GARGANO, PAUL BOWLING, RACHEL LANE and KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
| 22-1078 |
| January 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| S.S.I.D. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned.[27][7223257] [22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079] (AG) [Entered: 03/16/2022 09:21 AM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 03/16/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7223270-2] [7223270] [22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079] (AG) [Entered: 03/16/2022 09:46 AM] |
|
Filing 25
ORDER re: 1. Motion for service of process or duty to mitigating act by invoking the negligence official(s) secretive act SOSSA. 2. Motion for opinion(s) act (MA) or freedom act (FA), or page limitation, extension must be granted to be enforced by laws. 3. Motion for opinion(s) act (MA) or freedom act (FA), or page limitation, extension must be granted to be enforced by laws. 4. Motion for opinion(s) act (MA) or freedom act (FA), or page limitation, extension must be granted to be enforced by laws. 5. Motion for opinion(s) act (MA) or freedom act (FA), or page limitation, extension must be granted to be enforced by laws. Because it is unclear what relief the appellant seeks in his motions, the motions will be filed without court action. The appellant is reminded that his appeals are consolidated and his fee status has not been resolved in appeal nos. 22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, and 22-1079. (See order dated February 15, 2022.) Once the fee status has been resolved in each of the consolidated appeals, this court will enter a briefing schedule giving the appellant a deadline for filing his consolidated opening brief. It is unnecessary for the appellant to move to extend time to file his brief or to exceed the word or page limit in his brief until a briefing schedule has been entered in this appeal. SCR [25] [7219056] [22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 22-1080] (HTP) [Entered: 02/23/2022 02:03 PM]
|
| Filing 24 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain for Opinions Act, ("MA") or Freedom Act ("FA"), or page limitation, extension must be granted to be enforced by laws. [24] [7218738] [22-1078] (CAH) [Entered: 02/22/2022 03:16 PM] |
|
Filing 23
ORDER re: Motion for extension of time, extended pages limitations oppositing jurisdiciton by the ANT(s) Community Act ("TACA"). Because it is unclear what relief the appellant seeks, the motion will be filed without court action. CMD [23] [7217462] [22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 22-1080] (CG) [Entered: 02/15/2022 04:05 PM]
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER re: Motion to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis, filed in Appeal No. 22-1080 on 02/14/2022, by the pro se appellant. A review of the docket in appeal 22-1080 indicates that on 02/02/2022, the district court granted the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the appellants motion will be filed without further court action. A further review of the docket indicates that the appellants fee status in the remaining consolidated appeals is still unresolved. The appellant is reminded that in appeals 22-1076 and 22-1079, he must either pay the $505.00 in appellate fees or file motions for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court by 02/23/2022. The appellant is further reminded that in appeals 22-1077 and 22-1078 be must either pay the $505.00 in appellate fees in the district court or file motions for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court by 03/07/2022, and 03/04/2022, respectively. CMD [22] [7217449] [22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 22-1080] (MM) [Entered: 02/15/2022 03:48 PM]
|
| Filing 21 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1079, 22-1080 [21] [7217127] [22-1078] (CAG) [Entered: 02/14/2022 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 20 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain in 22-1080, 22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079 to extend time and to extend page limit. [20] [7217119] [22-1080, 22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079] (CAG) [Entered: 02/14/2022 03:31 PM] |
|
Filing 19
ORDER re: Appellant's February 11, 2022 Motion. [ # 18 ] It is unclear what relief the appellant is seeking in his motion. To the extent that the appellant would like to have this filing serve as his docketing statement, the request is DENIED. The statement is deficient and fails to comply with the courts rules. The clerk will send the appellant this courts instructions for preparing a docketing statement, so that the appellant may familiarize himself with the court's expectations. At a minimum, the appellant must include the date of the judgment or order being challenged, the date the notice of appeal was filed in the district court, and the basis for the district courts jurisdiction for each of his appeals. SCR [19] [7216860] [22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 22-1080] (AD) [Entered: 02/11/2022 01:47 PM]
|
| Filing 18 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain in 22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 22-1080 for official capture and jury demands. [18] [7216855] [22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 22-1080] (CAH) [Entered: 02/11/2022 01:19 PM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER: On February 10, 2022, the court received a box of documents from appellant. In light of the courts February 3, 2022, order, the documents will be returned unfiled. None of those documents are appellants docketing statement, opening brief, or a request for more time to file those documents. Appellant is reminded that his next filing should be his docketing statement, which remains due on February 16, 2022. MEK [17] [7216781] [22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 22-1080] (CG) [Entered: 02/11/2022 10:02 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER re: Motion for opposition or criminal intent and/or malicious against freedom of speech by the ant(s) freedom act. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. Appellants next filing should be his docketing statement, which is due February 16, 2022. Appellant is reminded that failure to file the docketing statement can lead to dismissal of his consolidated appeal for lack of prosecution. CIR. R. 3(c)(2). After filing his docketing statement, the next filing should be his brief, if this consolidated appeal proceeds to briefing. [ # 6 ] [ # 9 ] MEK [16] [7215274] [22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 22-1080]--[Edited 02/03/2022 by AP- to reflect no certified mail was sent] (AP) [Entered: 02/03/2022 04:11 PM]
|
| Filing 15 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. (See order for further details). Date IFP granted: 02/02/2022. [15] [7215113] [22-1080] (MM) [Entered: 02/03/2022 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 14 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 02/02/2022. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/04/2022 for Appellant Manetirony Clervrain [7215047] [14] [7215047] [22-1078] (CG) [Entered: 02/02/2022 04:43 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER: Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain in 22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 22-1080 is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Manetirony Clervrain by 02/16/2022. [13] [7214845] [22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 22-1080] (AD) [Entered: 02/02/2022 09:41 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
Order issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [12] [7213789] [22-1078] (CG) [Entered: 01/27/2022 03:05 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
Order issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [11] [7213780] [22-1080] (MM) [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:44 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
Order issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [10] [7213770] [22-1077] (MM) [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:37 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain Motion for opposition or criminal intent and/or malicious against freedom of speech by the ant(s) freedom act for mitigating financial burden or (IFP) constitutional issues by massive issues treatment act [9] [7213758] [22-1080]--[Edited 01/27/2022 by MAN to reflect correct document filed] (MAN) [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 8 Prose motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain for mitigating financial burden or (IFP) constitutional issues by massive issues treatment act. [8] [7213757] [22-1080] (MAN) [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 7 Prose motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain for mitigating financial burden or (IFP) constitutional issues by massive issues treatment act. [7] [7213756] [22-1078] (MAN) [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain for opposition or criminal intent and/or malicious against freedom of speech by the ant(s) freedom act [6] [7213755] [22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 22-1080] (MAN) [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain for mitigating financial burden or (IFP) constitutional issues by massive issues treatment act. [5] [7213753] [22-1077] (MAN) [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:16 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The court, on its own initiative, CONSOLIDATES these appeals. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending a resolution of the fee status in all five appeals. DW [4] [7212570] [22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 22-1080] (HTP) [Entered: 01/21/2022 02:22 PM]
|
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7211948] [22-1078] (AG) [Entered: 01/19/2022 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Maria Finnell, Peggy Welch, Amy Gilbert, Breanca Merrit, Cate Mashall, Christina Worrali, and Janet Simpson. [2] [7211945] [22-1078] (AG) [Entered: 01/19/2022 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Manetirony Clervrain by 01/27/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 02/01/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 02/01/2022 for Appellant Manetirony Clervrain. [1] [7211935] [22-1078] (AG) [Entered: 01/19/2022 12:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
