Travis Oliver v. David Marcowitz
| TRAVIS OLIVER |
| DAVID MARCOWITZ, Doctor, Dental Supervisor, SCCJ |
| 22-1123 |
| January 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [8] [7221842] [22-1123] (FP) [Entered: 03/09/2022 08:39 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER re: Memorandum and order, filed on 2/17/2022. In light of the district court's statement that it is inclined to modify its judgment, this case is REMANDED to the district court pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 12.1. The appeal is dismissed and the mandate shall issue forthwith. Any party dissatisfied with the judgment as modified must file a fresh notice of appeal. [ # 6 ]. Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge. [7] [7221835] [22-1123] (FP) [Entered: 03/09/2022 08:21 AM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 03/09/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7221852-2] [7221852] [22-1123] (FP) [Entered: 03/09/2022 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed district court order dated 02/17/2022, Pursuant to Rule 62.1, this Court hereby NOTIFIES the parties and the Court of Appeals that would be inclined to GRANT Olivers Motion for Reconsideration based on his excusable neglect, VACATE the Dismissal Order and Judgment, REOPEN this case, and ALLOW Count 1 to proceed against Dr. Marcowitz. [6] [7217927] [22-1123] (CAG) [Entered: 02/17/2022 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Travis Oliver leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 02/17/2022. [5] [7217922] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/21/2022 [22-1123] (CAG) [Entered: 02/17/2022 11:17 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [4] [7217533] [22-1123] (MM) [Entered: 02/16/2022 09:08 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Prose motion filed by Appellant Travis Oliver to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [3] [7217423] [22-1123] (LCP) [Entered: 02/15/2022 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7213420] [22-1123] (AD) [Entered: 01/26/2022 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 02/08/2022. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Travis Oliver by 01/31/2022. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 02/24/2022. [1] [7213416] [22-1123] (AD) [Entered: 01/26/2022 10:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Travis Oliver v. David Marcowitz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: TRAVIS OLIVER | |
| Represented By: | Travis Oliver |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DAVID MARCOWITZ, Doctor, Dental Supervisor, SCCJ | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
