Mark Benner v. Jesse Carlton
| MARK BENNER |
| JESSE CARLTON, Chief Probation Officer, St. Joseph County |
| 22-1139 |
| January 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Appearance form filed by Attorney Tyler G. Banks for Appellee Jesse Carlton. [7] [7224955] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1139] --[Edited 03/24/2022 by AP- to reflect the addition of counsel] (Banks, Tyler) [Entered: 03/24/2022 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 6 Paper copies of appellant brief filed by Appellant Mark Benner. [6] [7223393] [22-1139] (SK) [Entered: 03/16/2022 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mark Benner. Paper copies due on 03/16/2022. Appellee's brief due on or before 04/08/2022 for Jesse Carlton. Electronically Transmitted. REMINDER: Hearing notices are mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, no later than the filing of the appellant's brief in a criminal case and the filing of an appellee's brief in a civil case. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3). The court's calendar is located at http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [5] [7222083] [22-1139] (MLM) [Entered: 03/10/2022 08:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 Submitted appellant brief by John A. Kindley for Appellant Mark Benner. [4] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7222070] [22-1139] (Kindley, John) [Entered: 03/09/2022 10:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 ENTRY REMOVED AS ENTERED IN ERROR Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mark Benner. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7218775] [22-1139] (LCP) [Entered: 02/22/2022 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mark Benner. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7215230] [22-1139] (Kindley, John) [Entered: 02/03/2022 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability granted 12/23/2021. Fee paid. Transcript information sheet due by 02/11/2022. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Mark Benner by 02/03/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 03/09/2022 for Mark Benner. [1] [7213982] [22-1139] (AD) [Entered: 01/28/2022 11:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mark Benner v. Jesse Carlton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MARK BENNER | |
| Represented By: | John A. Kindley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: JESSE CARLTON, Chief Probation Officer, St. Joseph County | |
| Represented By: | Caryn Nieman Szyper |
| Represented By: | Tyler Banks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
