USA v. Jamar Jarvis
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JAMAR JARVIS |
| 22-1146 |
| January 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, SUSPENDS briefing in this appeal pending a ruling on counsels motion to withdraw. Further, attorney Brendan Shiller shall comply with the provisions of Fed. R. App. 10(b) regarding the preparation of transcripts. Attorney Brendan Shiller must file a Status Report regarding his compliance with this order no later than February 14, 2022. Attorney Brendan Shiller is further directed to attach a copy of the Transcript Information Sheet submitted to the court reporter to his Status Report, signed by the court reporter indicating the date the transcripts are expected to be completed. DW. [5] [7215495] [22-1146] (FP) [Entered: 02/04/2022 03:18 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Motion filed by Attorney Brendan Shiller for Appellant Jamar Jarvis to withdraw as counsel. [4] [7215244] [22-1146]--[Edited 02/03/2022 by MM to reflect attorney filer.] (Shiller, Brendan) [Entered: 02/03/2022 02:54 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant Jamar Jarvis shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed because it is untimely. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7214378] DW Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Jamar Jarvis by 02/14/2022 [3] [7214378] [22-1146] (ER) [Entered: 01/31/2022 02:49 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Defendant filed the appeal pro se in this criminal action. Counsel is reminded of the obligation to represent defendant on appeal unless specifically relieved by court upon a motion to withdraw for good cause. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel comply with the provisions of FRAP 10(b) regarding the preparation of the transcripts. Status report due for Appellant Jamar Jarvis by 02/07/2022. The attorney must file a Status Report regarding his compliance with this order, no later than 2/7/22. The attorney is further directed to attach a copy of the Transcript Information Sheet submitted to the court reporter to his Status Report, signed by the court reporter and indicating the date the transcripts are expected to be completed. [7214366] DW [2] [7214366] [22-1146] (ER) [Entered: 01/31/2022 02:37 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Jamar Jarvis by 02/04/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 03/09/2022 for Jamar Jarvis. Transcript information sheet due by 02/11/2022. [1] [7214216] [22-1146] (AP) [Entered: 01/31/2022 09:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Jamar Jarvis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Albert Berry III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: JAMAR JARVIS | |
| Represented By: | Brendan Shiller |
| Represented By: | Jamar Jarvis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
