Michael Henry v. USA, et al
MICHAEL F. HENRY |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK, KLEIN THORPE & JENKINS, KEITH PEKAU and THOMAS MURPHY |
22-1173 |
February 2, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: A notice of appeal filed before the district court issues its ruling on a timely Rule 59 motion is ineffective until the order disposing of the motion is entered on the district court's civil docket. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff-appellant Michael F. Henry shall file, on or before February 18, 2022, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be STAYED pending the entry of the order disposing of the motion. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order (See order for further details) DW [3] [3] [7215425] [22-1173] (AP) [Entered: 02/04/2022 12:48 PM] |
Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Howard Jablecki, Dennis Walsh, George Koczwara, and Cindy Nelson Katsenes. [2] [7215131] [22-1173] (HTP) [Entered: 02/03/2022 10:33 AM] |
Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael F. Henry by 02/09/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 02/16/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 02/16/2022 for Appellant Michael F. Henry. [1] [7215118] [22-1173] (HTP) [Entered: 02/03/2022 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.