Daryl Burnett, Jr. v. Keith Butts, et al
| DARYL K. BURNETT, JR. |
| KEITH BUTTS, T. THOMPSON, Hearing Officer Disciplinary and SARAH HAEFNER, Appeal Review Officer |
| 22-1198 |
| February 8, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Daryl Burnett, Jr. v. Keith Butts |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER re: Motion for leave to file and proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [ # 8 ] A review of the docket indicates that on March 24, 2022, the district court granted the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the appellants motion is DENIED as unnecessary. SCR [10] [7227908] [22-1198] (PS) [Entered: 04/06/2022 04:40 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Jurisdictional Statement filed by Appellant Daryl K. Burnett, Jr. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-1254 [9] [7227858] [22-1198] (CAH) [Entered: 04/06/2022 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 8 Prose motion filed by Appellant Daryl K. Burnett, Jr. to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [8] [7227803] [22-1198] (LCP) [Entered: 04/06/2022 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Daryl K. Burnett, Jr.. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-1254. (Duplicate of docket entry 3). [7] [7227802] [22-1198] (LCP) [Entered: 04/06/2022 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Daryl K. Burnett, Jr. leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 03/24/2022. District Court has assessed a $78.93 initial partial filing fee. [6] [7225065] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 04/22/2022. [22-1198] (CAG) [Entered: 03/24/2022 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [5] [7221224] [22-1198] (CAG) [Entered: 03/07/2022 08:35 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: On February 8, 2022, the appellant filed a motion requesting permission to appeal the judgment dismissing his case, which the district court treated as a notice of appeal, and appeal no. 22-1198 was opened. On February 16, 2022, the appellant filed a second notice of appeal and a second appeal, 22-1254, was opened. Both filings seek to challenge the same district court judgment, and two separate appeals are not necessary. Accordingly, appeal no. 22-1254 is administratively CLOSED. No appellate filing fees for appeal no. 22-1254 shall be imposed. The appellant is reminded to pay the appellate filing fees or file an in forma pauperis motion in appeal no. 22-1198 by March 10, 2022. [4] [7217971] [22-1198, 22-1254] (AD) [Entered: 02/17/2022 12:59 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Daryl K. Burnett, Jr.. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7217699] [22-1198] (CAG) [Entered: 02/16/2022 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7216216] (Note: The Office of the IN Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [22-1198] (CG) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Daryl K. Burnett Jr. by 02/15/2022. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/10/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 02/22/2022. [1] [7216213] [22-1198] (CG) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
