Reginald Jones v. Sandra Quick, et al
| REGINALD JONES |
| SANDRA QUICK and FRANK LAWRENCE, Warden, Chief Administrative Officer, Menard CC |
| 22-1237 |
| February 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER re: Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellate Court Fee. [ # 3 ] The motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant shall either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the clerk of the district court by 04/27/2022. The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. CMD [4] [7225804] [22-1237] (MM) [Entered: 03/29/2022 09:08 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Reginald Jones to extend time to file appellate court fee. [3] [7225686] [22-1237] (MAN) [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Reginald Jones. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 21-2700 [2] [7220760] [22-1237] (CAG) [Entered: 03/03/2022 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Reginald Jones by 02/22/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 03/01/2022. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/17/2022. [1] [7217323] [22-1237] (CG) [Entered: 02/15/2022 12:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
