Manetirony Clervrain v. Dan McConchie, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant / Appellee: DAN MCCONCHIE, JIM DURKIN, RONNA MCDANIEL, RICHARD PORTER and DEMETRA DEMONTE
Case Number: 22-1262
Filed: February 17, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: This appeal is DISMISSED for lack of prosecution. (See order for further details). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [15][7229667] [22-1262] (MM) [Entered: 04/13/2022 03:45 PM]
April 13, 2022 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 04/13/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7229678-2] [7229678] [22-1262] (MM) [Entered: 04/13/2022 04:02 PM]
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER re: 1. Motion for ["Right Venue Act"], ['Be"] ["Clear Consolidated Act"] by Victim of Crimes Against Various Officials Apartheid. 2. Motion for ["Serving Agencies"] to Reopen ['Question of Laws"], or Facts to [The ANT(s) Redaction Act"] ("Tara") by ["Prohibiting Act"] (P.A.). Because it is unclear exactly what relief the appellant seeks, the motions will be filed without court action. The appellant is reminded that he must either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fees in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with this court by 03/30/2022. CMD [14] [7224746] [22-1262] (MM) [Entered: 03/23/2022 10:56 AM]
March 23, 2022 Filing 13 Filed District Court order dated 03/22/2022, DENYING motion for extension of time. Forwarded to SCR, DW. [13] [7224690] [22-1262] (CAG) [Entered: 03/23/2022 09:24 AM]
March 21, 2022 Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain for "serving agencies" to reopen "questions of laws" or facts to "the ANT(S) redaction act" ("TARA") by "prohibiting act" ("PA") (same filing has also been docketed in cases 22-1362, 22-1241, 22-1280. [12] [7224259] [22-1262] (CAH) [Entered: 03/21/2022 04:42 PM]
March 21, 2022 Filing 11 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain for "right venue act," "be" "clear consolidated act" by victim of crimes against various officials apartheid (same filing has also been docketed in cases 22-1362, 22-1241, 22-1280). [11] [7224249] [22-1262] (CAH) [Entered: 03/21/2022 04:35 PM]
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff-appellant Manetirony Clervrain to show cause for his failure to respond to the courts order of February 22, 2022. Plaintiffappellant Clervrain shall file his response on or before March 18, 2022. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk is directed to attach a copy of the courts order of February 22, 2022, to appellants copy of this order. DW. [10] [7222485] [22-1262] (FP) [Entered: 03/11/2022 12:25 PM]
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Motion for [opinion(s) act] (MA) or [freedom ACT] (FA), or page limitation, extension must be granted to be enforced by laws. [ # 8 ] Because it is unclear exactly what relief the appellant seeks, the motion will be filed without court action. The appellant is reminded that he must either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fees in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with this court by March 30, 2022. The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. SCR [9] [7221412] [22-1262] (PS) [Entered: 03/07/2022 02:13 PM]
March 4, 2022 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain for ["oppinions(s) ACT"] ("MA") or [freedom ACT"] ("FA"), or page limitation, extension must be granted to be enforced by laws. [8] [7221123] [22-1262] (CAG) [Entered: 03/04/2022 02:28 PM]
March 4, 2022 Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-1076, 22-1077, 22-1078, 22-1079, 21-2258, 22-1241, 22-1280 [7] [7221120] [22-1262] (CAG) [Entered: 03/04/2022 02:27 PM]
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Manetirony Clervrain by 03/18/2022. [6] [7220895] [22-1262] (AD) [Entered: 03/04/2022 09:14 AM]
February 28, 2022 Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Mr. Manetirony Clervrain leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. (See order for further details). Date IFP denied: 02/28/2022. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/30/2022 for Appellant Manetirony Clervrain. [7219984] [5] [7219984] [22-1262] (MM) [Entered: 02/28/2022 04:24 PM]
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Appellant, on or before March 4, 2022, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. If appellant wishes to request an extension of time in which to file the notice of appeal, appellant should file an appropriate motion in the district court, not this court, as soon as possible. Appellant's jurisdictional memorandum should include a discussion of the status of any such motion. (See order for further details). [7218633] DW [4] [7218633] [22-1262] (HTP) [Entered: 02/22/2022 12:41 PM]
February 17, 2022 Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Mike Bost, Rodney Davis, Mary Miller, Adam Kinzinger, Darin LaHood, Don Tracy, Shaun Murphy, Judy Diekelman, Sean Morrison, Jay Reyes, Jack Dorgan, Bob Grogan, Mark Hosty, Nimish Jani, Char Foss-Eggmann, Mark Shaw, Roger Claar, Barb Viviano, Laura Pollastrini, Chapin Rose, John McGlasson, Jan Weber, Michael Bigger, Steven P. Matteucci, Jared F. Bartie, Prudence Beidler Carr, Adam C Cooper, Brian Hennigan, Fran Krasnow, Marlene Nations, Jan Stern Reed, James B. Speta, Susan Spies Roth, Robin Walker Sterling, Rita Winters, Laura Pedraza-Farina, Emily Mullin, Donald Rebstock, David L. Schwartz, Melissa L. Kaeser, George M. Langford II, Sarah B. Lawsk, Johann H. Lee, Darnell Hines, David Diamond, Juliann Cecchi, Julie L. Biehl, Hari M. Osofsky, Mark Batinick, Tom Bennett, Chris Bos, Avery Bourne, Dan Brady, Tim Butler, Dan Caulkins, Andrew Chesney, C.D. Davidsmeyer, Tom Demmer, Amy Elik, Randy Frese, David Friess, Amy Grant, Jackie Haas, Brad Halbrook, Norine Hammond, Paul Jacobs, Jeff Keicher, Seth Lewis, Mark Luft, Mike Marron, Deanne Mazzochi, Tony McCombie, Martin McLaughlin, Charlie Meier, Chris Miller, Tom Morrison, Mike Murphy, Adam Niemerg, Tim Ozinga, Keith P Sommer, Steve Reick, Dave Severin, Joe Sosnowski, Ryan Spain, Brad Stephens, Daniel Swanson, Dan Ugaste, Tom Weber, David Welter, Keith Wheeler, Blaine Wilhour, and Patrick Windhorst. [3] [7218212] [22-1262]--[Edited 02/23/2022 by JR.] (HTP) [Entered: 02/18/2022 11:11 AM]
February 17, 2022 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7218208] [22-1262] (HTP) [Entered: 02/18/2022 11:03 AM]
February 17, 2022 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Manetirony Clervrain by 02/22/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 03/03/2022. [1] [7218184] [22-1262] (HTP) [Entered: 02/18/2022 10:20 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Manetirony Clervrain v. Dan McConchie, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Represented By: Manetirony Clervrain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAN MCCONCHIE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JIM DURKIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RONNA MCDANIEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RICHARD PORTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DEMETRA DEMONTE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?