Gregory Jones v. Dustin Bayler
| GREGORY D. JONES |
| DUSTIN BAYLER |
| 22-1296 |
| February 24, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Gregory D. Jones for status. [8] [7231489] [22-1296] (LCP) [Entered: 04/22/2022 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 IT IS ORDERED that Appellant Gregory D. Jones show cause as to why this case should not be DISMISSED for failure to tender the PLRA Memorandum as directed in this court's 03/08/2022 order. Response to Rule to Showcause due for Appellant Gregory D. Jones by 04/25/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0002 1930 0340. [7] [7228664] [22-1296] (CAG) [Entered: 04/11/2022 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 6 Prose motion filed by Appellant Gregory D. Jones to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [6] [7225702] [22-1296] (LCP) [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 19-2323 [5] [7225699] [22-1296] (LCP) [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:37 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER re: Letter. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status has not yet been determined. Specifically, the appellant is reminded that he must either pay the $505.00 appellate fees in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and PLRA memorandum in support with the clerk of this court by March 28, 2022. (See the courts PLRA Fee Notice and Order dated February 25, 2022.) The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. CMD [4] [7221747] CMD [22-1296] (AP) [Entered: 03/08/2022 02:27 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed letter from Appellant Gregory D. Jones. [3] [7221697] [22-1296] (PS) [Entered: 03/08/2022 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Gregory D. Jones leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 02/25/2022. [2] [7219648] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/28/2022 [22-1296] (CAG) [Entered: 02/25/2022 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Transcript information sheet due by 03/10/2022. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Gregory D. Jones by 03/03/2022. [1] [7219493] [22-1296] (FP) [Entered: 02/25/2022 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gregory Jones v. Dustin Bayler | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: GREGORY D. JONES | |
| Represented By: | Gregory D. Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DUSTIN BAYLER | |
| Represented By: | Nadine J. Wichern |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
