Ronnie Martin v. Timothy Gray, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONNIE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee: TIMOTHY GRAY, TODD HIGGINS, Officer and RAY TAYLOR
Case Number: 22-1306
Filed: February 25, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders attorney Charles Edward Polk, III, of Crivello Carlson, S.C. Suite 500, 710 N. Plankinton Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203, to show cause for his failure to respond to the courts order of April 15, 2022. Attorney Charles Edward Polk, III, shall file his response on or before May 3, 2022. Counsel is advised that failure to respond may result in monetary or disciplinary sanctions. DW [11] [7231829] [22-1306] (CG) [Entered: 04/25/2022 04:10 PM]
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER issued GRANTING Motion to Amend Caption. [ # 8 ] The clerk will correct the docket and caption to reflect that defendants Todd Higgins and Ray Taylor are not parties in this appeal. CMD [10] [7231641] [22-1306] (AD) [Entered: 04/25/2022 09:47 AM]
April 22, 2022 Filing 9 Filed Response by Appellees Todd Higgins and Ray Taylor Attorney S. Michael Murphy to to Court Order for Jurisdictional Memorandum. [9][7231450] [22-1306] (Murphy, Sean) [Entered: 04/22/2022 12:27 PM]
April 22, 2022 Filing 8 Motion filed by Appellees Todd Higgins and Ray Taylor to Amend Caption. [8] [7231449] [22-1306] (Murphy, Sean) [Entered: 04/22/2022 12:25 PM]
April 22, 2022 Filing 7 Appearance form filed by Attorney S. Michael Murphy for Appellees Todd Higgins and Ray Taylor. [7] [7231409] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [22-1306] [Edited 04/22/2022 by CG to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Murphy, Sean) [Entered: 04/22/2022 11:14 AM]
April 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: In light of appellant Ronnie Martins failure to respond to the courts orders of February 28, 2022, and March 23, 2022, IT IS ORDERED that appellees file, on or before April 22, 2022, a responsive memorandum addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of February 28, 2022. DW [6] [7230169] [22-1306] (AP) [Entered: 04/15/2022 02:30 PM]
March 31, 2022 Filing 5 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 04/14/2022 for Appellant Ronnie Martin. [5] [7226673] [22-1306] (AD) [Entered: 03/31/2022 04:46 PM]
March 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff-appellant Ronnie Martin to show cause for his failure to respond to the courts order of February 28, 2022. Plaintiff- appellant Ronnie Martin shall file his response on or before April 6, 2022. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk is directed to attach a copy of the courts order of February 28, 2022, to appellants copy of this order. DW Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0002 1930 4065. [4] [7224889] [22-1306] (FP) [Entered: 03/23/2022 05:11 PM]
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant Ronnie Martin is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Ronnie Martin by 03/28/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0002 1930 4140. [3] [7222663] [22-1306] (AD) [Entered: 03/14/2022 09:03 AM]
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Ronnie Martin shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7219991] DW Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Ronnie Martin by 03/14/2022. [2] [7219991] [22-1306] (FP) [Entered: 02/28/2022 04:31 PM]
February 25, 2022 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Ronnie Martin by 03/04/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 03/11/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/11/2022 for Appellant Ronnie Martin. [1] [7219750] [22-1306] (HTP) [Entered: 02/28/2022 09:55 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ronnie Martin v. Timothy Gray, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RONNIE MARTIN
Represented By: Ronnie Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TIMOTHY GRAY
Represented By: Charles Edward Polk III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TODD HIGGINS, Officer
Represented By: Pauline Toulouse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RAY TAYLOR
Represented By: Pauline Toulouse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?