Oscar Ortiz v. Stewart Inman
| OSCAR ORTIZ |
| STEWART INMAN |
| 22-1432 |
| March 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the required docketing fee pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $505 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. The appellant has neither paid the $505 appellate fees nor filed a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court.[5][7235158] [22-1432] (MLM) [Entered: 05/10/2022 10:32 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 05/10/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7235184-2] [7235184] [22-1432] (MLM) [Entered: 05/10/2022 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Yordana J. Wysocki for Appellee Stewart Inman. [4] [7232184] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1432] [Edited 04/27/2022 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Wysocki, Yordana) [Entered: 04/27/2022 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Michael D. Bersani for Appellee Stewart Inman. [3] [7232177] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1432] [Edited 04/27/2022 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Bersani, Michael) [Entered: 04/27/2022 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Christian E. Ketter for Appellee Stewart Inman has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [2] [7231410] [22-1432] (LJ) [Entered: 04/22/2022 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Oscar Ortiz by 03/25/2022. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 04/18/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 04/01/2022. [1] [7223848] [22-1432] (HTP) [Entered: 03/18/2022 01:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Oscar Ortiz v. Stewart Inman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: OSCAR ORTIZ | |
| Represented By: | Oscar Ortiz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: STEWART INMAN | |
| Represented By: | Christian E. Ketter |
| Represented By: | Michael D. Bersani |
| Represented By: | Yordana Wysocki |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
