James Griffith v. Wexford of Indiana, LLC, et al
| JAMES F. GRIFFITH |
| WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, PENELOPE WADLEIGH, K. DAUSS, Doctor and DANIEL RIPPETOE |
| 22-1438 |
| March 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant James F. Griffith leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 05/03/2022. [4] [7233810] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 06/02/2022 [22-1438] (CAG) [Entered: 05/03/2022 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 3 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [3] [7228660] [22-1438] (CAG) [Entered: 04/11/2022 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Rachel D. Johnson for Appellees Daniel Rippetoe, Penelope Wadleigh, Wexford of Indiana, LLC and K. Dauss. [2] [7225459] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1438] [Edited 03/28/2022 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Johnson, Rachel) [Entered: 03/28/2022 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 04/01/2022. Docketing Statement due for Appellant James F. Griffith by 03/23/2022. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 04/18/2022. [1] [7224099] [22-1438] (FP) [Entered: 03/21/2022 12:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
