Bill James v. City of Chicago, et al
BILL JAMES |
CITY OF CHICAGO and KIM FOXX |
22-1462 |
March 22, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: Bill James shall show cause for failure to respond to the court's 3/23/22 order. Response to Rule to Showcause due for Appellant Bill James by 04/29/2022. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. Sent Certified Mail Receipt Number: 7018 0680 0002 2683 5484. DW [5] [7231177] [22-1462] (ER) [Entered: 04/21/2022 11:55 AM] |
Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Bill James. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-1210, 22-1357 [4] [7226398] [22-1462] (CAH) [Entered: 03/31/2022 08:36 AM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant Bill James shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7224870] dJurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Bill James by 04/06/2022. DW [3] [7224870] [22-1462] (AP) [Entered: 03/23/2022 04:23 PM] |
Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. (The Office of the Corporation Counsel has been notified of the filing of the appeal) [2] [7224725] [22-1462] (AP) [Entered: 03/23/2022 10:12 AM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Bill James by 03/29/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 04/05/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/02/2022 for Bill James [1] [7224722] [22-1462] (AP) [Entered: 03/23/2022 10:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.