NLRB v. ADT, LLC
| NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
| ADT, LLC |
| 22-1483 |
| March 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Application for Enforcement docketed with proof of service, pursuant to FRAP 15(c). U.S. Appeal. Agency record or certified list due by 05/04/2022. Respondent's answer to the Application for Enforcement due 04/15/2022. [1] [7225495] [22-1483] (CG) [Entered: 03/28/2022 09:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: NLRB v. ADT, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD | |
| Represented By: | Ruth E. Burdick |
| Represented By: | David Habenstreit |
| Represented By: | Peter S. Ohr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ADT, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy C. Moritz |
| Represented By: | Sara E. Olschewske |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
