Joshua DuPage v. Brett Butler, et al
| JOSHUA M. DUPAGE |
| BRETT BUTLER and CITY OF PEKIN, ILLINOIS |
| 22-1541 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Joshua M. DuPage leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 05/04/2022. [5] [7233995] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 06/03/2022 [22-1541] (CAG) [Entered: 05/04/2022 01:06 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal and prisoner trust account statement to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [4] [7229801] [22-1541] (MM) [Entered: 04/14/2022 10:58 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Prose motion filed by Appellant Joshua M. DuPage to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with trust statement tendered. [3] [7229556] [22-1541] (LCP) [Entered: 04/13/2022 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellee Brett Butler, per District Court docket and information sheet. [2] [7227183] [22-1541] (ER) [Entered: 04/04/2022 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Joshua M. DuPage by 04/08/2022. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 05/04/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 04/18/2022. [1] [7227168] [22-1541] (ER) [Entered: 04/04/2022 11:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
