Lorrie Meier v. Pacific Life Insurance Company
| LORRIE R. MEIER |
| PACIFIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 22-1607 |
| April 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Insurance |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Meier v. Pacific Life Insurance Co.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 08/03/2022 for Lorrie R. Meier. Appellee's brief due on or before 10/19/2022 for Pacific Life Insurance Company. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 11/30/2022 for Appellant Lorrie R. Meier. JNS [7241215] [22-1607] (HTP) [Entered: 06/08/2022 12:35 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 08/03/2022 for Lorrie R. Meier. Appellee's brief due on or before 10/04/2022 for Pacific Life Insurance Company. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 11/30/2022 for Appellant Lorrie R. Meier. JNS [7239010] [22-1607]--[Edited 05/27/2022 by FP to correct the typo for the due date of appellee's brief.] (FP) [Entered: 05/27/2022 12:00 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Added Attorney(s) Rebecca Rothmann for party(s) Appellee Pacific Life Insurance Company, in case 22-1607 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Rebecca M. Rothmann for Appellee Pacific Life Insurance Company. [8] [7233597] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1607]--[Edited 05/03/2022 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Rupkey, Daniel) [Entered: 05/03/2022 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Daniel Rupkey for Appellee Pacific Life Insurance Company. [7] [7233594] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1607] (Rupkey, Daniel) [Entered: 05/03/2022 10:55 AM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 06/13/2022 for Lorrie R. Meier. Appellee's brief due on or before 07/13/2022 for Pacific Life Insurance Company. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 08/03/2022 for Appellant Lorrie R. Meier. JNS [7231948] [22-1607] (CG) [Entered: 04/26/2022 09:51 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Wednesday May 11, 2022 at 9:30 a.,m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JNS. [5] [7231937] [22-1607] (CG) [Entered: 04/26/2022 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Joel M. Huotari for Appellant Lorrie R. Meier. [4] [7229651] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1607]--[Edited 04/13/2022 by PS - to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Huotari, Joel) [Entered: 04/13/2022 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney John J. Holevas for Appellant Lorrie R. Meier. [3] [7229642] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1607] -[Edited 04/13/2022 by ER - added Attorney John J. Holevas] (Holevas, John) [Entered: 04/13/2022 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Marc C. Gravino for Appellant Lorrie R. Meier. [2] [7229623] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1607] (Gravino, Marc) [Entered: 04/13/2022 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 04/26/2022. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/23/2022 for Lorrie R. Meier. [1] [7229304] [22-1607] (PS) [Entered: 04/12/2022 03:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
