James Martin v. Mike Galle, et al
| JAMES MARTIN |
| MIKE GALLE, PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. and TRISTICA HOWARD |
| 22-1662 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [18] [7242724] [22-1662] (AD) [Entered: 06/15/2022 02:54 PM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 06/15/2022 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7242730-2] [7242730] [22-1662] (AD) [Entered: 06/15/2022 03:02 PM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER: Appellant James Martin is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant James Martin by 06/17/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7019 0700 0000 6008 5061. [17] [7240294] [22-1662] (AD) [Entered: 06/03/2022 09:38 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER re: Motion for reconsideration for appeal, filed on 5/31/2022. The motion for reconsideration is DENIED. [ # 15 ] NER [16] [7239924] [22-1662] (FP) [Entered: 06/01/2022 04:10 PM]
|
| Filing 15 Pro se motion filed by Appellant James Martin for reconsideration of appeal. [15] [7239467] [22-1662] (CAG) [Entered: 05/31/2022 02:33 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER re: 1. Motion to appeal in forma pauperis. 2. Affidavit in support of motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. The motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. The appellant has not made a potentially meritorious argument that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint. Appellant shall pay the required docketing fee within 14 days, or else this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0001 4762 3825. [ # 11 ] [ # 7 ] NER [14] [7238153] [22-1662] (HTP) [Entered: 05/24/2022 11:30 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER re: 1. Motion for assistance with recruiting counsel to perfect appeal. 2. Amended motion to appoint counsel to perfect appeal. [ # 8 ] The motion for recruitment of counsel is DENIED. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647 (7th Cir. 2007) (en banc); Farmer v. Haas, 990 F.2d 319, 321 (7th Cir. 1993). The panel assigned to decide this case may recruit counsel if it finds that step appropriate after reviewing the briefs. NER [13] [7238139] [22-1662] (CG) [Entered: 05/24/2022 10:55 AM]
|
| Filing 12 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Jenny R. Buchheit & Andrew J. Miroff for Appellees Penn National Gaming, Inc., Tristica Howard and Mike Galle. [12] [7235910] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1662]--[Edited 05/12/2022 by FP to reflect that atty. Buchheit is added to the docket.] (Buchheit, Jenny) [Entered: 05/12/2022 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 11 Prose motion filed by Appellant James Martin to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [11] [7234980] [22-1662] (LCP) [Entered: 05/09/2022 02:58 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re: Plaintiffs Motion for Additional Time to Perfect the Appeal. [ # 6 ] A review of this courts docket indicates that the appellants fee status remains unresolved. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time to file his opening brief, the motion is DENIED. The appellant is reminded that the court will set a briefing schedule once his fee status has been determined. To the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time to file his Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement, the motion is GRANTED. The appellant file his docketing statement on May 27, 2022. CMD [10] [7232504] [22-1662] (AD) [Entered: 04/28/2022 09:09 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER re: Motion to appeal in forma pauperis. To the extent that the appellant seeks leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, his filing is incomplete because it does not include an asset affidavit. Accordingly, the appellant shall file the required asset affidavit by May 23, 2022. The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. CMD [9] [7232413] [22-1662] (HTP) [Entered: 04/27/2022 04:17 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Pro se amended motion filed by Appellant James Martin to appoint counsel to perfect appeal. [8] [7232355] [22-1662] (MAN) [Entered: 04/27/2022 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 Prose motion filed by Appellant James Martin to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [7] [7232354] [22-1662] (MAN) [Entered: 04/27/2022 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant James Martin for additional time to perfect appeal. [6] [7232352] [22-1662] (CAH) [Entered: 04/27/2022 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant James Martin for appointment of counsel. [5] [7231812] [22-1662] (LCP) [Entered: 04/25/2022 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 Courtesy copy of amended affidavit and motion for recusal of judge filed in the District Court by pro se Appellant James Martin. [4] [7231503] [22-1662] (CAG) [Entered: 04/22/2022 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 3 Courtesy copy of amended motion for relief of judgment filed in the District Court by pro se Appellant James Martin. [3] [7231501] [22-1662] (CAG) [Entered: 04/22/2022 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant James Martin leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and DENYING motion for appointment of counsel. (See order for further details). Date IFP denied: 04/21/2022. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/23/2022 for Appellant James Martin. [7231258] [2] [7231258] [22-1662] (MM) [Entered: 04/21/2022 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant James Martin by 04/25/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 05/05/2022. [1] [7231174] [22-1662] (CG) [Entered: 04/21/2022 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
