Doris Walker v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
DORIS V. WALKER |
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and LIENHUB, Third Party, doing business as GRANT STREET GROUP |
22-1680 |
April 22, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: In light of appellant Doris V. Walkers failure to respond to the courts orders of April 25, 2022, and May 19, 2022, IT IS ORDERED that appellees file, on or before June 21, 2022, a responsive memorandum addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of April 25, 2022. [9] [7241814] [22-1680] (AP) [Entered: 06/10/2022 02:34 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Benjamin Hoopes Cook for Appellee Bank of America, N.A. has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [8] [7240181] [22-1680] (LJ) [Entered: 06/02/2022 02:39 PM] |
Filing 7 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff-appellant Doris V. Walker to show cause for her failure to respond to the court order which issued on April 25, 2022 (although incorrectly bearing the date of October 30, 2020). Plaintiff-appellant Walker shall file her response on or before June 2, 2022. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The Clerk is directed to attach a copy of the courts order questioning jurisdiction to appellants copy of this order. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0001 4853 9705. DW [7] [7237287] [22-1680] (PS) [Entered: 05/19/2022 10:59 AM] |
Filing 6 THIS ENTRY HAS BEEN REMOVED AS ENTERED IN ERROR. [22-1680] (AD) [Entered: 05/18/2022 12:11 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Ms. Doris V. Walker leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 05/11/2022. Plaintiffs motion for permission to appeal in forma pauperis [69] is denied without prejudice as incomplete.Plaintiffs request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis must be denied in its current form. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a renewed motion for permission to appeal in forma pauperis that includes responses to all questions and does not leave any blanks by 5/18/2022. [5] [7235629] [22-1680] (AP) [Entered: 05/11/2022 03:23 PM] |
Filing 4 ORDER: Appellant Ms. Doris V. Walker is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Doris V. Walker by 05/24/2022. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0002 1930 4867. [4] [7235356] [22-1680] (AD) [Entered: 05/10/2022 03:38 PM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant Ms. Doris V. Walker shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7231841] DW Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Doris V. Walker by 05/09/2022. [3] [7231841] [22-1680] (AD) [Entered: 04/25/2022 04:22 PM] |
Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellee Lienhub, per District Court docket. [2] [7231668] [22-1680] (CG) [Entered: 04/25/2022 10:35 AM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Doris V. Walker by 04/29/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 05/06/2022. [1] [7231666] [22-1680] (CG) [Entered: 04/25/2022 10:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.