Henry Newton v. Frank Vanihel
Petitioner / Appellant: HENRY L. NEWTON
Respondent / Appellee: FRANK VANIHEL
Case Number: 22-1730
Filed: April 29, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re: Motion for appointment of counsel. [ # 4 ] The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647 (7th Cir. 2007) (en banc); Moreland v. Eplett, 18 F.4th 261, 272 (7th Cir. 2021). The panel assigned to decide this case may appoint counsel if it finds that step appropriate after reviewing the briefs. NER [8] [7244798] [22-1730] (PS) [Entered: 06/27/2022 04:12 PM]
June 9, 2022 Filing 7 Prose motion filed by Appellant Henry L. Newton to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [7] [7241560] [22-1730] (CAG) [Entered: 06/09/2022 02:12 PM]
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re: Motion to Proceed on Writ of Habeas Corpus In Forma Pauperis. To the extent that the appellant seeks leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, his filing is incomplete because it does not include an asset affidavit. Accordingly, the appellant shall file the required asset affidavit by 06/17/2022. The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. CMD [6] [7237442] [22-1730] (MM) [Entered: 05/19/2022 03:03 PM]
May 19, 2022 Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Henry L. Newton to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7237371] [22-1730] (CAG) [Entered: 05/19/2022 01:14 PM]
May 19, 2022 Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Henry L. Newton for appointment of counsel. [4] [7237370] [22-1730] (CAG) [Entered: 05/19/2022 01:13 PM]
May 4, 2022 Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Henry L. Newton leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and DENYING motion for certificate of appealability contained within his notice of appeal as unnecessary. (See order for further details). Date IFP denied: 05/03/2022. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 06/03/2022 for Appellant Henry L. Newton. [7233957] [3] [7233957] [22-1730] (MM) [Entered: 05/04/2022 12:03 PM]
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order issued in light of Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000), this case may proceed without a certificate of appealability. MPB [2] [7232903] [22-1730] (AP) [Entered: 04/29/2022 11:55 AM]
April 29, 2022 Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 05/13/2022.. [1] [7232902] [22-1730] (AP) [Entered: 04/29/2022 11:51 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Henry Newton v. Frank Vanihel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: HENRY L. NEWTON
Represented By: Henry L. Newton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: FRANK VANIHEL
Represented By: Monika Prekopa Talbot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?