Michael F. Henry v. USA, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KWAME RAOUL, VILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK, ILLINOIS, a Municipal Government Under Illinois Law, ILLINOIS BAR ASSOCIATION, GREGORY K. HARRIS and ILLINOIS STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Case Number: 22-1841
Filed: May 12, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 20, 2023 Michael F. Henry v. USA

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2022 Filing 13 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/20/2022 for Appellant Michael F. Henry. [13] [7246366] [22-1841] (AD) [Entered: 07/06/2022 02:45 PM]
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re: Motion for reconsideration, filed on 6/28/2022. The appellants shall request to reconsider is DENIED as repetitious. Further repetitious motions to reconsider will be rejected. See 7th Circuit Operating Procedure 1(c)(8). The appellants request for a stay is DENIED as unnecessary. A briefing schedule has not been set and there are no other proceedings to stay in this court. [ # 11 ] NER [12] [7245787] [22-1841] (FP) [Entered: 07/01/2022 03:22 PM]
June 28, 2022 Filing 11 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael F. Henry for reconsideration. [11] [7245080] [22-1841] (MAN) [Entered: 06/28/2022 04:19 PM]
June 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. On June 21, 2022, this court received a document titled Notice of Appeal from the appellant, which this court construes as a motion to reconsider its June 6, 2022, order denying appellants motion to dismiss. So construed, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to reconsider is DENIED. [ # 9 ] NER [10] [7244091] [22-1841] (AP) [Entered: 06/23/2022 11:38 AM]
June 21, 2022 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael F. Henry entitled notice of appeal of Circuit Judge Hamilton's denial of motion to dismiss this case and remand and/or waiver of filing fees. [9] [7243875] [22-1841] (AP) [Entered: 06/22/2022 01:59 PM]
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re: Motion to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). The motion is DENIED. The appellant shall either pay the $505.00 filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the district court by June 21, 2022. NER [8] [7240602] [22-1841] (CG) [Entered: 06/06/2022 10:49 AM]
June 3, 2022 Filing 7 Appellee Illinois Bar Association in 22-1841 substituted by Appellee Illinois State Bar Association in 22-1841, per clarification from 06/03/2022 disclosure statement. [7] [7240509] [22-1841] (CG) [Entered: 06/03/2022 03:47 PM]
June 3, 2022 Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Matthew Szwajkowski for Appellee Illinois Bar Association. [6] [7240459] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [22-1841] (Szwajkowski, Matthew) [Entered: 06/03/2022 02:29 PM]
May 19, 2022 Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Michael F. Henry. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7237314] [22-1841] (CAG) [Entered: 05/19/2022 11:29 AM]
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7236386] DW [4] [7236386] [22-1841] (FP) [Entered: 05/16/2022 02:23 PM]
May 16, 2022 Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Michael F. Henry to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [3] [7236266] [22-1841] (CAH) [Entered: 05/16/2022 10:57 AM]
May 12, 2022 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Steven Weinhoeft and John R. Lausch, Jr. [2] [7236019] [22-1841] (HTP) [Entered: 05/13/2022 10:54 AM]
May 12, 2022 Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael Henry by 05/18/2022. Transcript information sheet due by 05/26/2022. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/26/2022 for Appellant Michael Henry. [1] [7236017] [22-1841] (HTP) [Entered: 05/13/2022 10:45 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael F. Henry v. USA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MICHAEL F. HENRY
Represented By: Michael F. Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Ernest Yi Ling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KWAME RAOUL
Represented By: Nadine J. Wichern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: VILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK, ILLINOIS, a Municipal Government Under Illinois Law
Represented By: Howard Charles Jablecki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ILLINOIS BAR ASSOCIATION
Represented By: Matthew E. Szwajkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GREGORY K. HARRIS
Represented By: Ernest Yi Ling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ILLINOIS STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Represented By: Matthew E. Szwajkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?